flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of mark goldin
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:34 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Two way binding
>
>
>
> Alright. Is the following correct:
>
> Inside
ailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
] On
> Behalf Of mark goldin
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:34 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Two way binding
>
>
>
> Alright. Is the following correct:
s.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Two way binding
Alright. Is the following correct:
Inside of a model I have it nodes bound to form items. In the form I
have it items bound to model's nodes, and xmlmodelvar = event.result as
XML will pull data into the model as well as show int in the form&
Alright. Is the following correct:
Inside of a model I have it nodes bound to form items. In the form I have it
items bound to model's nodes, and xmlmodelvar = event.result as XML will pull
data into the model as well as show int in the form's controls?
Tracy Spratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The simplest is to declare an instance variable typed as XML:
var _xmlEmployee:XML;
Then assign the event.result as XML in a result handler:
_xmlEmployee = event.result as XML;
If you want to use the declarative style, do:
And in the result handler, do:
xmlEmployee = event.result as X
Thanks for you thought on this. Actually the only reason that I need
a copy of the object is to achieve the binding from the text field
back to the data model.
I created a simple function to bind the text field to a data model:
private function bindToInput(event:FlexEvent):void{
6 matches
Mail list logo
