along these same lines, is there a reason to use a Timer vs a
setTimeout call for simple timeout type events?
I recall the docs seeming to hint that a Timer is better, but I find
the setTimeout event REALLY useful.
- Kevin
On Apr 22, 2008, at 11:48 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Flex/Flash is
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:56 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Timer questions
along these same lines, is there a reason to use a Timer vs a
setTimeout
Flex/Flash is single-threaded which means that nothing can keep the next
line of code from running.
You won't get a timer event until you finish your loop, and you don't
need to worry about calling stop() until you no longer want timer
events.
From:
3 matches
Mail list logo
