RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-10 Thread Abdul Qabiz
rom: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:12 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects Hi Christophe, I bet the bug is because you have the constructor doing initial value assignment.

RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-09 Thread Dirk Eismann
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Chotin Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:12 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects Hi Christophe, I bet the bug is because you have the constructor doing initial value assign

Re: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-09 Thread Christoph Guse
Chotin Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:12 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects Hi Christophe,   I bet the bug is because you have the constructor doing initial value assignment.  Joe Berkovitz posted a very detailed account of how Flex

RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-08 Thread Peter Farland
rs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt ChotinSent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:12 PMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects Hi Christophe,   I bet the bug is because you have the constructor doing initial value assignment.  Joe Be

RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-08 Thread Matt Chotin
).   HTH, Matt   From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Christoph Guse Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:36 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects   Hi Peter, I still have the problem with my

RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-08 Thread Dimitrios Gianninas
: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects Hi Peter,I still have the problem with my complex Remote Objects. Here is some code and other stuff:Output:Implementation in MXML:          {person.phones}       Input in person from remot

RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-03 Thread Tracy Spratt
Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph Guse Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 11:57 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects Hi Peter, I've used Object.registerClass on Phones and Person. I

Re: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-03 Thread Christoph Guse
Hi Peter, I've used Object.registerClass on Phones and Person. I didn't really test if the type information is lost. But if I access an Array member directly, i.e. ApplicationPerson.phones[0].number I get a warning: "1 Warning found. Warning /WEB-INF/flex/user_classes/personen/PersonInfo.mxm

RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-03 Thread Alistair McLeod
Hi Christoph, You should look into the labelFunction property of the DataGrid - it lets you specify a function which formats the data for a datagrid column. Cheers, Ali -- Alistair McLeod Development Director iteration::two [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: +44 (0)131 338 6108 This e-mail and an

RE: [flexcoders] complex Remote Objects

2005-06-03 Thread Peter Farland
If you've used Object.registerClass on both Phones and Person classes there should be no problem with them being returned in an Array (that is, the Flash Player creates the Phones instances during deserialization no matter how deeply nested). When you say: "There are objects in ApplicationPers