Tolulope Olonade
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:17
AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders]
Gartner's Take on Rich Internet Applications
Oh I see.
That’s a very blurry line created by
the broadcast just like you said. Especially with the topic “Gartners
take on RIA J”
saw flex applications.
Thanks for shedding more light David.
Regards
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Mendels
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 1:27
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders]
Gartner's Take on
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005, Sjors Pals wrote:
> Its funny that these kind of products are considered as RIA's since
> the only Internet thing about it that you run a plugin in a browser
> window :-\
You mean, in the same way you run Flex apps :-)
/Jeppe
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://gro
Title: Gartner’s Take on Rich Internet Technology
Hi,
Gartner did not select Nexaweb over Flex. Gartner has
not done such a report. I have met many times with Gartner and they are
quite excited about FlexI am confident that when and if they do their
trademark Gartner Magic Quadrent
Its no hype, as far as i read its hard to implement and it uses there
own runtimes.
I don't think this product is really suitable for internet apps, but
more a replacement for "traditional" desktop applications.
Its funny that these kind of products are considered as RIA's since the
only Intern
5 matches
Mail list logo
