At 06:00 PM 10/30/2005, Lee A Crocker wrote:
There is a proposal winding its way through the FCC
that will change how the bands are allocated, from
according to mode to bandwidth.
The present proposal sets up 3 bandwidth portions of
the band that are demarked by signals that occupy
200hz or less
I made an argument to be allowed to do some experimentation to show them
why they did not want to do this. The executive committee has been
tasked with deciding what to do about the proposal. All I wanted was a
delay on the vote in January for me to give them some technical input
based on rea
will you be around from 5-6 UTC?
On Sunday 30 October 2005 05:10 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK now that the contest is over, we have a real clean shot. Everyone is
> tired.
>
> I'm on 30 meters right now. I'll see if I can get anything going and stay
> for at least 10minutes, weather permit
OK now that the contest is over, we have a real clean shot. Everyone is
tired.
I'm on 30 meters right now. I'll see if I can get anything going and stay
for at least 10minutes, weather permitting (raining now).
If you want the SDR to SDR DX now should be best.
I will transmit on 7.081 and list
That is a real surprise to me since the League claims they have not
voted on this and that it has not been submitted. Are you sure?
Bob
N4HY
Lee A Crocker wrote:
There is a proposal winding its way through the FCC
that will change how the bands are allocated, from
according to mode to ban
Lee,
Unless I am misinformed, such a proposal is NOT presently before the FCC and
also does not appear to be winding it's way thru the FCC process. Such a
proposal has been threatened by the ARRL but has not been submitted.
In fact, the ARRL proposal is woefully lacking in definition as to ho
There is a proposal winding its way through the FCC
that will change how the bands are allocated, from
according to mode to bandwidth.
The present proposal sets up 3 bandwidth portions of
the band that are demarked by signals that occupy
200hz or less, signal that occupy 500hz or less, and
signals
No problems inporting the database on my setup. Just had to change the
buffers. Also my com port keying stopped working. But after playing some
in the contest and then returning in the morning and rebooting the computer,
the lower buffers seemed to be working OK as is the COM port keying.
I was
As I believe I was the first one to post problems with the newest release I
thought I might post what I did to solve these problems.
Believe it or not I used this release in the contest, I ran single op single
band 40 meters so after spending Friday nite/Sat morn operating - I got about
5-6 hrs
At 11:32 AM 10/30/2005, Robert McGwier wrote:
The following film, done for an advert by Honda, cost millions, months,
cost careers, and wrecked lives:
http://www.steelcitysfinest.com/HondaAccordAd.htm
Having spent some years in the industry producing such ads, I can say that
costing millions,
Mike,
The problem we found with the ATU was likely the culprit here. That low
level hardware control stuff can bite ya. Thanks for being patient with us
on that.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike K
And we wonder why products cost so much.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert McGwier
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 1:33 PM
To: FlexRadio
Subject: [Flexradio] Why big industry products cost so much
The following film, done for an advert b
The following film, done for an advert by Honda, cost millions, months,
cost careers, and wrecked lives:
http://www.steelcitysfinest.com/HondaAccordAd.htm
--
Laziness is the number one inspiration for ingenuity. Guilty as charged!
Hi all, its working here real good.
I worked from a previous database import.
I hear some intermitiant buzzes when moving around and clicking on things,
it does not do this all the time.
Something funky is going on with the power level controls...(1 watt version
here)
When I set the RF lev
Hi Folks,
this is my experience with 1.4.5V2.
All work for me but...starting with brand new MDB file !
Audio ok with 1024 DSP buffer and 512 on D44
Ok the PTT, ok the CAT, ok the TX EQ but it start operate
only when I "touch" one of the slider, any slider.
The only one error is in RECORD w
I am having a problem using the "new keyer".The old keyer works fine. I am
wondering what the "paddle src" selection is for. It doesn't seem to be
covered in my documentation. I have version 1.4.4.
Dave N1IX
AHAH!!
Just tried Klaus's suggestion and voila no fatal error on restart of the
console. Since the console was running when I read the posting I started
the wizard from the Setup form and could hear the sensitivity drop (RFE bd is on
the bench in the lab waiting for the rest of the boards to
Phil, Bob and
Eric,
here
is another observation that might
help to find a solution: I use the 3-board-stack. When I configure
for a system with RFE-board I can start and shutdown the console
without problems. However, when I disable the RFE board in the General Tab to cheat the
system (RX is
Finally downloaded 1.4.5 Preview 2. Installed OK but the audio was VERY
broken up. Till I changed the audio buffer to the highest setting. But
there the latency for the audio monitor is very bad. Could not get it to
work on the other buffer settings.
Used it to work some in the contest and hel
just worked them on 7.058 qsx 7.255
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 10:51 PM
To: Bob Tracy
Cc: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] where is V31??
Look for V31MD on 40 meters worki
Look for V31MD on 40 meters working split (listening up and sometimes not).
I'm about to start operating, will work 80 or 160, whichever is
profitable. We've been spotted with some regularity, look for V31MD
spots.
How we'll operate tomorrow (Monday Belize time) is not known. It's the
last day
21 matches
Mail list logo
