rmail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061001/9adf25ca/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radi
...with the SDR-1000? I am sure all of us have asked ourselves that
question at least once.
I was talking to John W5GI today on 14.185 and the skip was longer than
the path from Raleigh to Austin. I was a solid 52 barefoot; just above
the noise - John was a 57 running a KW.. John did an on-air
I use both devices (and the on-board sound) in my development machine
without any problems.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of Howard M. Sherer
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 2:54 PM
> To:
Hello,
They have to discuss their official answer with the laywers first...
I started this thread, but the funny thing is that I dont miss the scanning
at all.
I just wanted to know why I couldnt find it. I got many answers. :-)
But..if I had ordered the VHF transverter module I'd really miss it.
go much above 25 watts?
>
>BTW, I have an SDR on order and will be receiving it tomorrow!
>
>73
>Zack
>N8FNR
>-- next part --
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061001/ff5b7cb2/attachmen
> Why no scanning with SDR?
> ...
> there are limitations on what "open" SDR
> software should do.
Now that's a good one!
Flex has said they don't scan because of regulatory issues. Whether anyone
agrees or not really doesn't matter. They are free to include or remove any
features they wish.
Howard,
I'm using both the FA-66 and D44 in a single computer, the only degradation
I've observed is that the D44 only works in the 48KHz sampling rate mode.
It gets funky at 96KHz. I haven't played enough with the D44 settings to see
if I can fix this problem.
I would recommend you leave both i
Why no scanning with SDR? Because the software and the
hardware aren't both products for sale. The software is open
and available. The software used by us can be used for
radios other than just ham radios. So - there are limitations
on what "open" SDR software should do.
Major ham radio compa
I plan to install an FA-66 to replace my Delta 44 very soon. should I
un-install or remove my Delta 44 from service in my PC, or can I keep it in
service for other PC applications? Would my PC slow down very much using tow
sound cards?
I currently use a Behringer mixer as my mic preamp and assume
In the panadapter and spectrum mode it seems to me I'm looking at the "power
bandwidth" of the received audio and not a RTA reponse because of the linear
scale(s). Is this the case and can someone please comment on the differences
with/without log scales, FFT vis-a-vis RTA displays that may or may
At 11:06 AM 10/1/2006, Lyle Johnson wrote:
> >> The theory behind PSK shows that it is indeed far better than CW.
> >>
> > Begging to differ, but PSK is not "better" than CW, if we are talking
> > weak signal detection.
>
>Just a point of interest: in the NASA deep space network, working with
>trul
[1] Not running a clean and linear signal, the rule is never use ALC.
[2] Mains hum due to lack of isolation between PC and radio.
Simon Brown
---
RSGB HF Convention October 2006: http://www.rsgb-hfc.org.uk/
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Lux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> One might wonder i
t of you use for RTTY? Do you
>find
> > it safe to go much above 25 watts?
> >
> > BTW, I have an SDR on order and will be receiving it tomorrow!
> >
> > 73
> > Zack
> > N8FNR
> > -- next part --
> > An HTML attachment was scrubb
At 09:22 AM 10/1/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The SDR2k is rated 25 watts for RTTY & PSK31? Isn't that a little
>low for a rig in this price class? Does anyone know why it is rated so low?
It's the same as most other 100W rigs. For almost all rigs the 100W
rating is almost always a SSB PEP, w
Interesting discussion. I have to agree that CW is probably the most
"reliable" mode of communication - STILL. Hell, we can rap on a wall
with an SOS, but not so with PSK or other modes. And I've not tried
modulating the hull of a ship with my voice to let someone outside
know there are people i
>> The theory behind PSK shows that it is indeed far better than CW.
>>
> Begging to differ, but PSK is not "better" than CW, if we are talking
> weak signal detection.
Just a point of interest: in the NASA deep space network, working with
truly weak signals, PSK is used rather than carrier on
Hah! I was comparing PSK vs. standard CW (say 20 WPM), of course you
couldn't read my mind (what there is left).
I agree about the weak signal CW work, very interesting indeed.
I am currently designing and implementing a new digital software program, I
want to incorporate slow speed CW detectio
Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
> The theory behind PSK shows that it is indeed far better than CW.
>
>
Begging to differ, but PSK is not "better" than CW, if we are talking
weak signal detection. Indeed, with software such as "Argo" and VERY
slow CW, signals can be copied well below the noise. Ev
The theory behind PSK shows that it is indeed far better than CW.
This next week I have to dig this out for a presentation, I'll copy it here
as well.
The idea behind PSK and QRP in general is brains, no brawn.
Simon Brown
---
RSGB HF Convention October 2006: http://www.rsgb-hfc.org.uk/
-
Klaus, DK7XL was able to get his hands on a FA-66 for a short time to do
some initial performance measurements on the soundcard.
Due to the limited amount of time with the FA-66, these do not represent
the optimized performance numbers, but are representative of the FA-66.
There is a Knowledge Ba
Hmmm. Never need more than 40 watts on PSK.
Does that also mean that we never need to
run a KW on CW? Or is PSK that much better
than CW?:)
Mike - AA8K
Tim Ellison wrote:
> To reiterate Brian's comments, please do not operate PSK with any more
> than 25-30 watts. One of the most annoyi
use for RTTY? Do you
find
> it safe to go much above 25 watts?
>
> BTW, I have an SDR on order and will be receiving it tomorrow!
>
> 73
> Zack
> N8FNR
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
/piperm
power level that most of you use for RTTY? Do you find
> it safe to go much above 25 watts?
>
> BTW, I have an SDR on order and will be receiving it tomorrow!
>
> 73
> Zack
> N8FNR
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
d will be receiving it tomorrow!
73
Zack
N8FNR
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061001/ff5b7cb2/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-
SDR-1000. The UA-1ex operates
> only in REC or PLAY with 96k.4. Transmit audio no deficencies were
> observed.Willi - thanks for purchasing the UA-1ex for testing!73s - Klaus,
> DK7XL
> -- next part --
Sorry about wrong info earlier.
http://kb.flex-radio.com/Article.aspx?id=10251
John P. Basilotto
W5GI
Marketing and Product Manager
FlexRadio Systems
Office 512-250-8595
Mobile 512-663-6727
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Basilotto
Se
The FA-66 Quick Start Guide can be found at
http://www.flex-radio.com/download_files/PowerSDR/Docs/Edirol_FA-66_Quick_St
art_Guide.pdf
FlexRadio Systems is pleased to announce that we are now a Roland
distributor for the Edirol FA-66 FireWire Audio Interface. The Edirol box
will replace the PreSonu
Dear Flexers and Future Flexers:
In the interest of making it easier for visitors to find information, we
have overhauled our website. Additionally, we have reorganized some content
to better advertise our current hardware and software products as well as
future FlexRadio Systems products.
Along
Thanks Klaus and Sami for your comments which means that I can place an
other sound device on display in my sound card collection. There are many
ways to lose money but buying insufficient soundcards is comparatively less
painful.
vy 73 Willi
- Original Message -
From: "Sami Aintil
On 10/1/06, Willi Reppel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your report on the USB Edirol I bought. On the
> package on the device Edirol announced "Zero latency, direct monitoring" and
> I wonder what your findings about this statement are.
If you check out the Delta 44 specs for example, y
s - Klaus, DK7XL
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061001/0a6ee277/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio
hasing the UA-1ex for testing!
73s - Klaus, DK7XL
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061001/b4ecbdb8/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
Flex
:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20061001/87194795/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex
Ralph Bird wrote:
> Another newbie!
> I wonder if anyone on the reflector is using the DEM 144Mhz tvtr with the
> SDR-1000.
>
Not yet, but my DEM add on arrived yesterday and I hope to fit it to a
QRP SDR1000 shortly, which will become my 28MHz or 144MHz IF for
whatever transverters I can get
On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 19:55 -0400, Frank Brickle wrote:
> Sigh. Once again, G3UKB laps the field.
>
> Is it getting a little lonely out there, being so far ahead of pack?
>
> :-)
>
> Very fine work, Bob.
>
I don't feel ahead of the pack in most respects. Hopefully, everything
that goes into th
There is a project at http://jungerl.sourceforge.net/ called otp.net. It's a
port of the
jinterface java code to c#. I tried it out, and there were several bugs and at
least
one unfinished method. I updated it for the latest version of erlang and sent
the
new code to the project owner. He check
36 matches
Mail list logo
