The user interface has had NO work marrying the user interface to the contest
software for contesting. The K3 has had plenty of work marrying the radio to
the contest software. If you look at N1MM for example there is a K3 SPECIFIC
interface between the radio and the contest program, and that
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Bob McGwier wrote:
> Bill:
>
> While not making light of the problem, which we are addressing in
> software, your calculation of -65 dbc producing -95 dBm signal is, best
> case, pure BS. W5ZN was recipient of the fix in software and it worked.
> The actual re
lters). I hate the
way PowerSDR ruins the run station workflow.
One half of this will be fixed soon (spur)
73s
N4HY
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Bill Tippett
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:25:13
To:
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] [FlexRadio] Flex 5000 has a 2.
My apologies but I didn't notice that the problem, i.e. 2.4kHz spur,
was CW until *after* I posted this morning. I have been gone/busy all
day since I posted that I had to be reminded that I didn't really
answer the question.
So, I have gone back with my F5K and used RX2 to check the spectral
puri
quot;Ross Stenberg"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] [FlexRadio] Flex 5000 has a 2.4 Khz Spur
I don't have an amp to provide a 160 kilowatt test transmission but I'm
sure others could provide one for listeners to make ther own judgement a
rday, January 09, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] [FlexRadio] Flex 5000 has a 2.4 Khz Spur
I don't have an amp to provide a 160 kilowatt test transmission but I'm
sure others could provide one for listeners to make ther own judgement as
to the severity of the spur. I'm not f
Lets just wait until the guys in Austin come back to work next week and see
where we are on this. No need to be defensive about this, they said they
were working on an automated solution and we just need to wait and hear
where it is. The idea they would lie about it is ungentlemanly as well as
offe
I don't have an amp to provide a 160 kilowatt test transmission but I'm sure
others could provide one for listeners to make ther own judgement as to the
severity of the spur. I'm not from Missouri but show me the money.
73 Ross K9COX
___
FlexRadio
WB6RQN:
>I then put the transmitter into tune and turned the output up to 100W. In
this case I see products 600Hz, 1800Hz, and 2400Hz below the fundamental.
These products are +/- 1dB at 65dB below the carrier. Also see these
products above the carrier within the TX passband about 2dB higher, i.e
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:40 AM, lazysenior wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi All
> I ordered a Flex 5000 5 days ago and will get it in a couple of weeks.
> Since then I have been told by a couple of hams I respect (W8JI and W4ZV)
> that the Flex 5000 has a serious spur 2.4khz below the fundamental
> especially b
10 matches
Mail list logo
