Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-20 Thread Lee A Crocker
The use of 100's of receivers is obvious. Use speech recognition and CW/digital recognition on signals that can be heard and then use AI or neural network to analyze what people are talking about and how they relate to YOUR interests. You can have the "program" then list your interests and how

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Bob McGwier
You are correct. Lux, James P wrote: Bob, I think you mean M> 100.. N is the number of RF interfaces, and is either 1 or 2 for the FlexRadio product line (in a single physical box).. One could make N bigger by getting multiple boxes. You also made the important distinction between Receive bo

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Lux, James P
Bob, I think you mean M> 100.. N is the number of RF interfaces, and is either 1 or 2 for the FlexRadio product line (in a single physical box).. One could make N bigger by getting multiple boxes. You also made the important distinction between Receive boxes and Transmit boxes. Just as one can

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Bob McGwier
This did not get answered. N is > 100 for the Atom 330 when I am done where N is limited to software receivers running in parallel. Bob Simon (HB9DRV) wrote: What's N for the various Flex radios? (Gremlins ate the formatting in my previous post.) Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-delux

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
What's N for the various Flex radios? (Gremlins ate the formatting in my previous post.) Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com - Original Message - From: Lux, James P The conceptual model is like you have N tunable block converters... __

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Robert McGwier
The major technological win, the truly fantastic innovation which came from me working with a genius (fred harris) needs publication approval from my masters (U.S. government). This does not mean we need to stop rolling this out. It means that it will not be in its final form when it first rolls

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Robert McGwier
The question is ill posed I think. Do you mean how many IF paths are available simultaneous for (say) the receiver? Let me do some guessing and then answer my guesses. Please correct my incorrect guesses. 5000: two up to 192 kHz wide each for RX and one for TX. 3000: one up to 96 kHz wide on TX

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blogWhat's N for the various Flex radios? Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com - Original Message - From: Lux, James P The conceptual model is like you have N tunable block converters... __

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Lux, James P
The conceptual model is like you have N tunable block converters (200kHz wide in the case of the F5K), followed by M software radios that tune within the band converted. And, there are constraints on where you can tune the block converter for spur purposes. So the general process, given you wa

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Simon (HB9DRV)
Hi Tim and Jim, Thanks - now I know :) For my own education I want to write a SDR console, I'm justr working out the base requirement. Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com - Original Message - From: "Tim Ellison" Only the FLEX-5000 has the ability to have two ultra high p

Re: [Flexradio] [SPAM] Re: FLEX-3000 OOB blog

2009-03-19 Thread Tim Ellison
Only the FLEX-5000 has the ability to have two ultra high performance fully independent (physical) receivers. The FLEX-3000 and FLEX-1500 have only one physical receiver (but have the capability for an additional "watch" receiver). PowerSDR provides for one additional "watch" receiver (on VFO B