: [Flexradio] FW: The inherent muddiness of typical
amateurtransceiver audio without EQ
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:47 AM
To: 'Edwin Marzan'
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] The inherent muddiness of typical amateur
transceiver
I suspect that it is because we always try
to push the limits in ham radio. Sort of
like the hot-rodder tinkering with the
vehicle to squeeze even more performance
out of it.
Stereo: why not? Using independent
sideband, we could do that. What better
place to experiment than ham radio? There
Quoting Mike Naruta [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Tue 03 Jun 2008 06:12:51 AM PDT:
I suspect that it is because we always try
to push the limits in ham radio. Sort of
like the hot-rodder tinkering with the
vehicle to squeeze even more performance
out of it.
Stereo: why not? Using independent
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Tue 03 Jun 2008 06:18:12 AM PDT:
Interesting reading for all...
http://www.polycom.com/common/documents/whitepapers/effect_of_bandwidth_on_speech_intelligibility_1.pdf
I can appreciate the fact that we all have the FLEXibility to dial in o
Excellent link.
Quoting Lee Mushel [EMAIL PROTECTED], on Tue 03 Jun 2008
06:00:12 AM PDT:
How on earth did this high fidelity audio business ever get started? I
suggest that all go to the library and find some of the papers on
communications readability by the Western Electric engineers who studied
this
: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:59 AM
Subject: [Flexradio] FW: The inherent muddiness of typical
amateurtransceiver audio without EQ
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 6:47 AM
To: 'Edwin Marzan'
Subject: RE: [Flexradio
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Date: Tue,
3 Jun 2008 08:00:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [Flexradio] FW: The inherent muddiness
of typical amateurtransceiver audio without EQ How on earth did this high
fidelity audio business ever get started? I suggest that all go
7 matches
Mail list logo
