At 01:00 PM 4/30/2007, Lee A Crocker wrote:
Bob has a part of it and Duane has a part of it and Jim has a part of it.
For example Jim describes an RF module which I think is a good
distinction between the analogue hardware and the digital
hardware. So maybe the second concept is the digital
Lee A Crocker wrote:
Jim
I would be interested in hearing more about the proper nomenclature to
describe the signal path in a SDR. I think this might be the key to being
able to adequately describe in simple terms to the average ham how a SDR
works. I have been writing some stuff to try
--- Bob McGwier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lee A Crocker wrote:
Jim
I would be interested in hearing more about the proper
nomenclature to describe the signal path in a SDR. I think
this might be the key to being able to adequately describe
in simple terms to the average ham how a SDR
]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of Duane - N9DG
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Bob McGwier; Lee A Crocker
Cc: Flexradio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] RX (SW) vs. RX (HW)
snip
Like Lee I often find it a challenge to properly convey the
details of the underlying technology to someone who
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] RX (SW) vs. RX (HW)
It is indeed challenging to convey what are essentially some brand new
Bob has a part of it and Duane has a part of it and Jim has a part of it.
For example Jim describes an RF module which I think is a good distinction
between the analogue hardware and the digital hardware. So maybe the second
concept is the digital module where the actual I/Q and ADC sampling
Two words, Lee. FLOW CHART!
-Tim
-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee A Crocker
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:00 PM
To: Flexradio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] RX (SW) vs. RX (HW)
Bob has a part of it and Duane has a part
(a)hetnet.nl
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
pa0pvn(a)gmail.com ; pa0pvn(a)amsat.org .
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] namens Lee A Crocker
Verzonden: do 26-4-2007 22:44
Aan: Flexradio
Onderwerp: Re: [Flexradio] RX (SW) vs. RX (HW)
Jim
I would be interested in hearing more about
Jim
I would be interested in hearing more about the proper nomenclature to describe
the signal path in a SDR. I think this might be the key to being able to
adequately describe in simple terms to the average ham how a SDR works. I have
been writing some stuff to try and delineate this for
In all this discussion about multiple RX's and duplex
operation it might become lost that there are multiple RX's
both in and out of the HW context. Someone coming into this
discussion from a more traditional radio HW design view of
the world can easily miss this.
I assume that the baseline 5000A
.
-Tim
-
FRS KB Administrator
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duane - N9DG
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:00 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] RX (SW) vs. RX (HW)
In all this discussion about multiple RX's and duplex
At 12:06 PM 4/25/2007, Duane - N9DG wrote:
Tim,
The trick will be to present it all in a way that allows
those who are totally unfamiliar with FlexRadio/PowerSDR to
truly understand what is really going on.
In the end I'm not exactly sure what the best terminology is,
but simply calling the HW
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] RX (SW) vs. RX (HW)
Tim,
The trick will be to present it all in a way that allows
those who are totally unfamiliar with FlexRadio/PowerSDR to
truly understand what is really going on. My fear is that
using the term SubRX for the optional HW piece may make
many think
13 matches
Mail list logo
