At 08:18 AM 8/26/2006, Robert McGwier wrote:
>As described, this is all perfect for audio being played to speakers.
>Irrespective of what audiophiles say and how wonderful they think their
>ears are, they cannot hear the phase noise the described system would
>introduce.
I beg to differ (not
As described, this is all perfect for audio being played to speakers.
Irrespective of what audiophiles say and how wonderful they think their
ears are, they cannot hear the phase noise the described system would
introduce. A radio with a super sensitive panadapter and having goals
of nois
At 03:16 AM 8/26/2006, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>Jim Lux wrote:
> > Something to contemplate for future incarnations is the ability to
> > synchronize the audio streams (I/Q and/or baseband) from multiple radios,
> > preferably on separate computers, but even on the same computer.
> >
>
>On Lin
Jim Lux wrote:
> Something to contemplate for future incarnations is the ability to
> synchronize the audio streams (I/Q and/or baseband) from multiple radios,
> preferably on separate computers, but even on the same computer.
>
> If one wants to do "interesting" things requiring coherent proces
Something to contemplate for future incarnations is the ability to
synchronize the audio streams (I/Q and/or baseband) from multiple radios,
preferably on separate computers, but even on the same computer.
If one wants to do "interesting" things requiring coherent processing, like
diversity com
5 matches
Mail list logo
