[Flightgear-devel] Seg fault on 2nd reset

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
I'm getting a set fault after resetting twice with either LaRCsim or JSBSim. In both cases it's getting through the FDM init, updates the material textures, updates sun and moon positions, and then quits after printing: Logging priority is info Set logging classes to terrain|astro|flight|input|gl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New manual available.

2002-02-16 Thread Martin Spott
> The HTML versions on the website are trying to load non-existent CSS > files (getstart.css & FGShortRef.css). NS4 won't even show the page > without the CSS files in place. :-/ This is triggered when you have JavaScipt enabled in Netscape. The page displays perfectly if you disable JavaScript

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seg fault on 2nd reset

2002-02-16 Thread Jim Wilson
Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I'm getting a set fault after resetting twice with either LaRCsim or > JSBSim. In both cases it's getting through the FDM init, updates the > material textures, updates sun and moon positions, and then quits after > printing: > Logging priority is info >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seg fault on 2nd reset

2002-02-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: > Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >>I'm getting a set fault after resetting twice with either LaRCsim or >>JSBSim. In both cases it's getting through the FDM init, updates the >>material textures, updates sun and moon positions, and then quits after >>printing: >>Loggi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seg fault on 2nd reset

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 06:55, Erik Hofman wrote: > Jim Wilson wrote: > > Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > >>I'm getting a set fault after resetting twice with either LaRCsim or > >>JSBSim. In both cases it's getting through the FDM init, updates the > >>material textures, updates su

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seg fault on 2nd reset

2002-02-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Tony Peden wrote: > I'm getting a set fault after resetting twice with either LaRCsim or > JSBSim. In both cases it's getting through the FDM init, updates the > material textures, updates sun and moon positions, and then quits after This seems depandand on when you do it (how quick after each ot

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Seg fault on 2nd reset

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 09:00, Erik Hofman wrote: > Tony Peden wrote: > > I'm getting a set fault after resetting twice with either LaRCsim or > > JSBSim. In both cases it's getting through the FDM init, updates the > > material textures, updates sun and moon positions, and then quits after > > Thi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New manual available.

2002-02-16 Thread David Megginson
Martin Spott writes: > > The HTML versions on the website are trying to load non-existent CSS > > files (getstart.css & FGShortRef.css). NS4 won't even show the page > > without the CSS files in place. :-/ > > This is triggered when you have JavaScipt enabled in Netscape. The page > disp

[Flightgear-devel] ..fgfs-base-0.7.9.tar.gz == fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz ???

2002-02-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz 29271566 02/13/02 03:18:00 pm file is the same as todays fgfs-base-0.7.9.tar.gz??? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with kind regards from Arnt... ;-) Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ___

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..fgfs-base-0.7.9.tar.gz == fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz ???

2002-02-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
I'm working on it ... hope to have the official 0.7.9 uploaded to the ftp server soon. Curt. Arnt Karlsen writes: > > fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz 29271566 02/13/02 03:18:00 pm file > is the same as todays fgfs-base-0.7.9.tar.gz??? > > -- > ..med vennlig hilsen = with kind regards from Arnt..

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..fgfs-base-0.7.9.tar.gz ==fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz ???

2002-02-16 Thread John Check
On Saturday 16 February 2002 02:32 pm, you wrote: > I'm working on it ... hope to have the official 0.7.9 uploaded to the > ftp server soon. > > Curt. > gimme 5 minoots to update the docs > Arnt Karlsen writes: > > fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz 29271566 02/13/02 03:18:00 pm file > > is the same as

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..fgfs-base-0.7.9.tar.gz == fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz ???

2002-02-16 Thread Martin van Beilen
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 01:32:39PM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > I'm working on it ... hope to have the official 0.7.9 uploaded to the > ftp server soon. Would it be possible to distribute the scenery part of the base package seperately? IIRC the scenery hasn't changed sinde 0.7.8, so there is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ..fgfs-base-0.7.9.tar.gz ==fgfs-base-0.7.9pre2.tar.gz ???

2002-02-16 Thread John Check
Fire when ready Curt On Saturday 16 February 2002 02:50 pm, you wrote: > On Saturday 16 February 2002 02:32 pm, you wrote: > > I'm working on it ... hope to have the official 0.7.9 uploaded to the > > ftp server soon. > > > > Curt. > > gimme 5 minoots to update the docs > > > Arnt Karlsen writes:

[Flightgear-devel] 0.7.9 release

2002-02-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Ok, web and ftp should be all updated. 0.7.9 should be all there. The official announcement will be coming soon. I think I'm going to go take a week's vacation now. :-) Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 0.7.9 release

2002-02-16 Thread John Check
On Saturday 16 February 2002 03:08 pm, you wrote: > Ok, web and ftp should be all updated. 0.7.9 should be all there. > The official announcement will be coming soon. > > I think I'm going to go take a week's vacation now. :-) > > Curt. Y'gotta admit it gets a little easier each time though ;)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 0.7.9 release

2002-02-16 Thread Martin Spott
> Ok, web and ftp should be all updated. 0.7.9 should be all there. German mirror ist updating at the moment and will be ready until bandwidth permits. Curt, in 'netstat' this will show up as 134.91.82.3. > I think I'm going to go take a week's vacation now. :-) I'm gonna have a beer first ..

[Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Martin van Beilen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello list, I have been playing around with the wind some more, and it seems that JSBSim doesn't only have the up/down winds inverted, but the north and east winds as well. I think I am beginning to understand what the source of the confusion is. A

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 12:39, Martin van Beilen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hello list, > > I have been playing around with the wind some more, and it seems > that JSBSim doesn't only have the up/down winds inverted, but the > north and east winds as well. > >

[Flightgear-devel] plib led font?

2002-02-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Did someone out there say they had an LED font for plib? Curt. -- Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org

Re: [Flightgear-devel] New manual available.

2002-02-16 Thread Cameron Moore
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Spott) [2002.02.16 08:29]: > > The HTML versions on the website are trying to load non-existent CSS > > files (getstart.css & FGShortRef.css). NS4 won't even show the page > > without the CSS files in place. :-/ > > This is triggered when you have JavaScipt enabled i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Jim Wilson
Martin van Beilen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I have been playing around with the wind some more, and it seems > that JSBSim doesn't only have the up/down winds inverted, but the > north and east winds as well. > Hmmm...doesn't look like it to me. Just rolling down the runway I applied a 200kn

Re: [Flightgear-devel] plib led font?

2002-02-16 Thread John Check
On Saturday 16 February 2002 04:53 pm, you wrote: > Did someone out there say they had an LED font for plib? > > Curt. http://rockfish.net/fg/transistor.txf it's not great. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Martin van Beilen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 12:59:55PM -0800, Tony Peden wrote: > From is the accepted convention in aviation, hopefully that's what > JSBSim treats as positive. I'll attempt to verify later. No need to verify. JSB does indeed use 'from' vectors. Howe

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Martin van Beilen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 09:57:25PM -, Jim Wilson wrote: > Hmmm...doesn't look like it to me. Just rolling down the runway I applied a > 200knot guest from the east and it blew me off the correct side :-) It may work well from the command-line.

[Flightgear-devel] Re: plib led font?

2002-02-16 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis L. Olson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020216 23:07]: > Did someone out there say they had an LED font for plib? Yes, John said he had one, and I have. I tried to make it look like the one from KX155 shots, albeit not slanted, because this looked to ragged. There is certainly room for improvement

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 14:11, Martin van Beilen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 12:59:55PM -0800, Tony Peden wrote: > > > From is the accepted convention in aviation, hopefully that's what > > JSBSim treats as positive. I'll attempt to veri

[Flightgear-devel] Re: plib led font?

2002-02-16 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis L. Olson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020216 23:07]: > Did someone out there say they had an LED font for plib? My LED font has only digits, a minus and a dot for now, so it can't be used for the whole program (unless you want your menus empty). The fonts are of about the same size as the curren

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> > Please note that there is a difference between fgfs's internal > > representation of wind, and the way it is set by the user. As an > > engineer, I am partial to using 'to' vectors internally. > > Yup, that is more mathematically correct. IMHO, I think the way JSBSim does it is more consisten

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 15:22, Jon S. Berndt wrote: > > > Please note that there is a difference between fgfs's internal > > > representation of wind, and the way it is set by the user. As an > > > engineer, I am partial to using 'to' vectors internally. > > > > Yup, that is more mathematically corr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Alex Perry
> > > > Please note that there is a difference between fgfs's internal > > > > representation of wind, and the way it is set by the user. As an > > > > engineer, I am partial to using 'to' vectors internally. > > > Yup, that is more mathematically correct. There is nothing mathematical about the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 16:06, Alex Perry wrote: > > > > > Please note that there is a difference between fgfs's internal > > > > > representation of wind, and the way it is set by the user. As an > > > > > engineer, I am partial to using 'to' vectors internally. > > > > Yup, that is more mathematic

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Tony Peden writes: > One could apply a similar argument to a vane; it doesn't change the > fact that the air is flowing the other way ( and that may well be > why the aviation convention is "from" ) And here in the northern hemisphere when you refer to a 'north wind' you are usually talking abo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Wind confusion.

2002-02-16 Thread Tony Peden
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 16:56, Curtis L. Olson wrote: > Tony Peden writes: > > One could apply a similar argument to a vane; it doesn't change the > > fact that the air is flowing the other way ( and that may well be > > why the aviation convention is "from" ) > > And here in the northern hemisph

[Flightgear-devel] compiled binaries for 0.7.9

2002-02-16 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Right now on the FlightGear downloads page we have ready to run binaries for Windows, Mac OS X, Debian, and Sgi. As people build executables for these platforms it would be great to be able to point to them. Dave, were you going to do the windows binaries like you did for the pre releases? If s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compiled binaries for 0.7.9

2002-02-16 Thread Jon S. Berndt
From: Curtis L. Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Right now on the FlightGear downloads page we have ready to run > binaries for Windows, Mac OS X, Debian, and Sgi. > > If someone wants to contribute binaries for an additional platform > that would be very welcome as well. > > Thanks, > > Curt. I'll

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compiled binaries for 0.7.9

2002-02-16 Thread Jonathan Polley
I'm missing something for OS X. When I try to run the Mac version, I get the following error: dyld: ./fgfs-0.7.9-02.16.02 can't open library: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.6.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2) Since I am missing the entire X11R6 directory, I assume that I need to load Xfre