Someone wrote:
> > My biggest concern right now is that nearly all of the screenshots on
> > the startup splash screens are of U.S. combat aircraft: they don't
> > bother me (though I'd prefer to see Mosquitos, Hurricanes, and Spits),
> > but they might turn off a lot of users. Perhaps we could bi
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Innis Cunningham wrote:
> If you want to see what happens if you have a lot of AI aircraft have a look
> at FS2K2.Just flying around I get about 25fps but if I goto an airport with
> lots of AI A/C parked(many textures)I am lucky to get 7fps yet in FG I can
> get 60+fps no prob
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:59:06 +0100,
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Could someone fly over and take some snaps?
..snaps? Tape it. ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry.
Norman Vine wrote:
Doesn't help
""The contents of this Web site are copyright C2002-2003 Mark Johnston and the Reno
I think if you got in contact with them and explained who you were and what you are doing that not only might they allow you to use their material, but may even endorse and assist
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Erik Hofman wrote:
> I've been working on making the autoconf scripts for SimGear cleaner and
> much more flexible. It would be nice if some developers want to try it out:
>
> http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/download/SimGear-configure_clean.diff
>
> I would particularly be inter
Hey all,
Sorry for coming in late on this, but I can clear a few things up.
> Regarding multiplay, even though my lan's 100mb and the lan loading is
> pretty
> light, the 'other' a/c jump around a lot when I get close them. What
is
> the
> most likely cause of this?
Yep, this is simply an artifa
I noticed a typo (that to my shame I'm responsible for introducing)
lingers in the CVS copy of FlightGear/configure.ac. It won't affect many
users, but it'd be nice if the typo was killed anyway.
The attached (trivial) diff takes care of it. The reference to $FLAGS in
line 217 should be $CFLAGS.
On Sunday 06 July 2003 20:39, Norman Vine wrote:
> Jon Berndt writes:
> >
> >
> > http://www.airrace.org/raceCourse.php
>
> Doesn't help
>
> ""The contents of this Web site are copyright C2002-2003 Mark Johnston and
the Reno Air Racing Association.
> No part of this Web site may be reproduced
On Sunday 06 July 2003 14:59, David Megginson wrote:
> Lee Elliott writes:
>
> > The sad this is that much interesting research and developement has
> > been done for military systems and you can't really investigate
> > them outside that sphere. The good thing about a sim is that you
> > can
Jon Berndt writes:
>
>
> http://www.airrace.org/raceCourse.php
Doesn't help
""The contents of this Web site are copyright C2002-2003 Mark Johnston and the Reno
Air Racing Association.
No part of this Web site may be reproduced without the express written consent of the
copyright holders"""
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 15:39:21 +0100 (BST),
Lawrence Manning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> > David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > My biggest concern right now is that nearly all of the screenshots
> > > on the
> > What do you think we do now? Fair Use is now Fair Use.
> >
> > g.
>
>
> http://www.airrace.org/raceCourse.php
>
That's a cool site Jon. Thanks for the link. I had _no_ idea that the F1
course was so bloody small. It must be one hell of a show.
g.
> What do you think we do now? Fair Use is now Fair Use.
>
> g.
http://www.airrace.org/raceCourse.php
http://tinyurl.com/g5io
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Gene Buckle writes:
>
> > > > http://www.pylon1.com/news/need4speed/fsar_01/index_02.shtml
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oh goodie. I think I'll go copyright Hudson Bay and charge everyone that
> > > takes pictures of it.
> > >
> > > Screw 'em. Set up the pylons with a 100 foot or so offset.
> >
> > I am
> Norman Vine wrote:
> > Gene Buckle writes:
> >>>"By: Mark Kallio
>
> >>>Complete article is here:
> >>>http://www.pylon1.com/news/need4speed/fsar_01/index_02.shtml
> >>
> >>Oh goodie. I think I'll go copyright Hudson Bay and charge everyone that
> >>takes pictures of it.
> >>
> >>Screw 'em. Set
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Gene Buckle wrote:
>
> > Better yet, give 'em 50% of FlightGear's commercial revenue. (ie. diddly
> > squat)
>
> So far FlightGear only costs me money. DO you think they wil start
> paying me 50% then?
>
It would be nice, eh? :)
g.
___
> > > http://www.pylon1.com/news/need4speed/fsar_01/index_02.shtml
> > >
> >
> > Oh goodie. I think I'll go copyright Hudson Bay and charge everyone that
> > takes pictures of it.
> >
> > Screw 'em. Set up the pylons with a 100 foot or so offset.
>
> I am with you on this one Gene.
>
> I wouldn't
Norman Vine wrote:
Gene Buckle writes:
"By: Mark Kallio
Complete article is here:
http://www.pylon1.com/news/need4speed/fsar_01/index_02.shtml
Oh goodie. I think I'll go copyright Hudson Bay and charge everyone that
takes pictures of it.
Screw 'em. Set up the pylons with a 100 foot or so offset.
Gene Buckle wrote:
Better yet, give 'em 50% of FlightGear's commercial revenue. (ie. diddly
squat)
So far FlightGear only costs me money. DO you think they wil start
paying me 50% then?
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://
Gene Buckle writes:
>
> > > It would be neat to build a duplicate of the Reno Air Races course and
> > > field.
> >
> > Well... we can't do that.
> >
> > "By: Mark Kallio
> >
> > Well, it was a nice thought while it lasted - developing a plug-in for air
> > racing fans out there to go online and h
> > It would be neat to build a duplicate of the Reno Air Races course and
> > field.
>
> Well... we can't do that.
>
> "By: Mark Kallio
>
> Well, it was a nice thought while it lasted - developing a plug-in for air
> racing fans out there to go online and have a "virtual air race" on a
> "virtual
If the heading mode is FG_HEADINGWAY_POINT does autopilot block use
a similar procedure like in VOR or ILS navigation by using a rolling motion
to intersect waypoint in a pre-determined heading or does it use the angle
difference between its current heading and the heading calculated by t
> My biggest concern right now is that nearly all of the screenshots on
> the startup splash screens are of U.S. combat aircraft: they don't
> bother me (though I'd prefer to see Mosquitos, Hurricanes, and Spits),
> but they might turn off a lot of users. Perhaps we could bias them
> more towards
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Jim Wilson wrote:
> David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > My biggest concern right now is that nearly all of the screenshots on
> > the startup splash screens are of U.S. combat aircraft: they don't
> > bother me (though I'd prefer to see Mosquitos, Hurricanes, and S
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> My biggest concern right now is that nearly all of the screenshots on
> the startup splash screens are of U.S. combat aircraft: they don't
> bother me (though I'd prefer to see Mosquitos, Hurricanes, and Spits),
> but they might turn off a lot of users.
Lee Elliott writes:
> The sad this is that much interesting research and developement has
> been done for military systems and you can't really investigate
> them outside that sphere. The good thing about a sim is that you
> can. You can also do lots of other things, like racing,
> re-enact
Arnt Karlsen writes:
> ..David M, hints for Emacs-for-FlightGear setup?
Sure. Use XEmacs, out of the box.
To build the project, type
C-c c
in the top level directory; you can step through errors, jumping
automatically to the appropriate source code line, with
C-x `
In the top-level dir
On 6 Jul 2003 09:02:59 GMT,
Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ..and, gun support _is_ gonna come, either here or in a fork, you
> > like it or not.
>
> I believe frightening an OpenSource developer by mention
Hi,
I've been working on making the autoconf scripts for SimGear cleaner and
much more flexible. It would be nice if some developers want to try it out:
http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/download/SimGear-configure_clean.diff
I would particularly be interested in the result of the prthread test
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ..and, gun support _is_ gonna come, either here or in a fork, you
> like it or not.
I believe frightening an OpenSource developer by mentioning the word 'fork'
belongs to the past - it does not work out any more these days. In the end,
those people will
30 matches
Mail list logo
