[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded Blender 2.30, but this version has no ac3d file support.
It seems that ac3d file support is still a missing feature in Blender and
on
the Todo list.
Do you know any other free 3d editors that can read ac3d files?
Blender 2.30 is ok for ac3d files. read :
Hi,
one think/thing added:
Maik Justus schrieb:
Hi,
I try to explain my confusion:
Lets think the heli is in forward flying and the rotor is spinning
counter clock wise (seen from top, like the bo 105). Relative to air the
rotor blades at the left side are slower and on the right side
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maik Justus wrote:
By the way: With this changes the heli is not anylonger parallel to
ground (while hovering). It is tiltet to the left to compensate the
tail rotor force.
That sounds wrong to me. The *rotor* should be tilted, but the
airframe is
On 25 Nov 2003, at 23:56, Jon Stockill wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, David Luff wrote:
Eliminated the bloody annoying flickering.
I was going to ask if you could do anything about this - not good on
the
eyes - particularly when zoomed in, and a large percentage of the
screen
is flashing.
In
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, James Turner wrote:
already got them! So I'll have to find something else to do :-)
Ahaa, nice to have someone else working on additions for this side of the
pond too. Just to avoid any overlap - the first batch I'll be working on
are all the RAF airfields. If anyone has
James Turner wrote:
One thing I'd really like is the ability to place some generic,
rectangular buildings objects down, on the airports. Obviously this
outputs to a totally different place to the runways.dat file so is
there any chance of eventually rolling TaxiDraw into FGSD? (I
On 26 Nov 2003, at 10:53, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
The reason I mention is, I was about to add a couple of GUI features
to
taxidraw (like a list box to select airports by name instead of ICAO
code), but I don't really want to invest brain-space learning
WxWindows
if I can avoid it. Not that I'm
I'll take the liberty of replying to you all at once...
On 11/26/03 at 11:02 AM James Turner wrote:
Right, being able to include an aerial photo as Jon suggested, or a
plan (as is available from the CAA, for major Uk airports), would
obviously greatly ease taxi-way creation.
I've almost
On 26 Nov 2003, at 11:44, David Luff wrote:
I've almost finished getting a 5 arc-second orange grid overlay
working,
which is the same as used on the CAA aerodrome charts available online
(UK
aip). I was also going to add functionality to call wget to get the
Terrasever US aerial photos and
On 11/25/03 at 6:22 PM Jon Stockill wrote:
With mouse control added, and the ability to directly edit the taxiway
features I thought I'd have a try at something a bit more complex.
I think this proves that Taxidraw is an extremely useful bit of software:
On 11/26/03 at 10:08 AM James Turner wrote:
One thing I'd really like is the ability to place some generic,
rectangular buildings objects down, on the airports. Obviously this
outputs to a totally different place to the runways.dat file so is
there any chance of eventually rolling TaxiDraw
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, David Luff wrote:
Now that looks *extremely* impressive. How many RAF fields are there in
the FlightGear database as a rough guess?
Probably somewhere around 50 - I'll get a list together. All the dispersal
areas, and the changes made over the years make them rather
On 11/26/03 at 1:08 PM Jon Stockill wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, James Turner wrote:
Right, being able to include an aerial photo as Jon suggested, or a
plan (as is available from the CAA, for major Uk airports), would
obviously greatly ease taxi-way creation.
Hmm, that sounds useful - where
website
Hello,
1.the design of the website is really good now, but I think we need a new logo. I´m
sure there are enough people with painting skills among us. Just post some ideas or
pictures!
2. There is a picture gallery on the website, but lots of screenshots are very old. I
think I know
Ilja,
I people occasionally want to send new screen shots, please do. I
have a script that makes them very easy to add to the gallery page. I
can't promise that every submission will be posted on the web page,
but if you submit a picture that looks good, or shows something
interesting, or shows
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:08:40PM +, Jon Stockill wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, James Turner wrote:
Right, being able to include an aerial photo as Jon suggested, or a
plan (as is available from the CAA, for major Uk airports), would
obviously greatly ease taxi-way creation.
Hmm,
* Andy Ross -- Wednesday 26 November 2003 05:30:
http://www.plausible.org/andy/fg-nasal.html
This and your examples (mouse handling, etc.) have totally
won me over! I've already written my first nasal script
$FG_ROOT/Nasal/bo105.nas
print(Loading bo105.nas);
rearpos =
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:26:46PM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I believe they are currently directional. If someone came up with a
really nice texture (or set of textures) we could probably do some
work on the terragear end to optimize the runway creation code for
that texture approach.
On 11/25/03 at 6:22 PM Jon Stockill wrote:
With mouse control added, and the ability to directly edit the taxiway
features I thought I'd have a try at something a bit more complex.
I think this proves that Taxidraw is an extremely useful bit of software:
The FlightGear logo on the top of the website.
Ilja
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:38:58 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
1.the design of the website is really good now, but I think we need a
new logo. I?m sure there are enough people with painting skills among
us. Just post some
Just all the best aircrafts, but I haven´t got a powerful machine.
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ilja,
I people occasionally want to send new screen shots, please do. I
have a script that makes them very easy to add to the gallery page. I
can't promise that every submission
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:22:28 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FlightGear logo on the top of the website.
Yes, I know. I am familiar with it: I made it. :-)
What don't you like about it?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Spott wrote:
No, because the BO105 - contrary to the 'usual' Bell's for example -
has a rigid rotor. Please have a look here:
http://www.b-domke.de/AviationImages/Rotorhead.html#Eurocopter
Well, that explains my confusion... I guess this just shows my
helicopter ignorance. My belief
Hi Andy,
Andy Ross wrote:
What is the rationale behind the decision to make them rigid on the
BO105? The only advantage I can see is that you save a few axles and
bearings, which are moving parts that can wear out. But you pay for
it in extra stress cycles on the blade, so I can't see how this
Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:22:28 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FlightGear logo on the top of the website.
Yes, I know. I am familiar with it: I made it. :-)
What don't you like about it?
Maybe some folks aren't aware of the consolidated
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Gene Buckle wrote:
That last field is very impressive. I did notice that there are no curved
corners in the taxiways like their are in the real thing. Is this on
purpose?
It's because I've not got around to adding them yet - I'm just too
impatient and wanted to see what
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can't find them online, try your local airfield/flying club.
They'll probably allow you to photocopy their AIP for the airfield(s)
you're interested in.
David was right - they're available as PDFs on www.ais.org.uk - the site
navigation is
Since I enjoy seeing sunset twice, I performed an experiment in
FlightGear: watching the sun set at the end of the runway, then taking
off and climbing to bring the sun back above the horizon to see it set
again.
The problem is that the sun came above the horizon too quickly, and
stayed above the
Jon Stockill writes:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can't find them online, try your local airfield/flying club.
They'll probably allow you to photocopy their AIP for the airfield(s)
you're interested in.
David was right - they're available as PDFs on
As I continue to ponder my horizon ideas, I am driven to ask: is the
FlightGear visibility code perhaps too naive? In real life, if you
are ten miles up looking down on landscape with fifteen-mile
visibility, do you really only see a little five-mile-radius patch?
(And: is this what the current
Is there any chance that a centreline could be displayed on the taxiway
segments? It'd make lining up very small square sections a lot easier,
rather than having to check the properties every time (if this isn't
possible for all the segments is it possible for just the selected one?)
(Taxiway
Hi guys,
We've just had a really lucky day in Bristol today, as far as weather
goes. There were some dark clouds in the West, I think we wouldn't
have seen much of Concorde's last flight if it had been half an hour
earlier or later!
Anyway, I took some pictures of G-BOAF on its last flight,
If I can give my opinion, 1 mile visibility sometimes looks like 20 mile
visibility when your only a mere 3000 ft up in the sky ... It's a really
a difficult subject this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon
Craig Rhodes
Sent: 26
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 10:45, Jon Stockill wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, James Turner wrote:
already got them! So I'll have to find something else to do :-)
Ahaa, nice to have someone else working on additions for this side of
the
pond too. Just to avoid any overlap - the first
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 15:37, Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:22:28 +0100 (CET)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FlightGear logo on the top of the website.
Yes, I know. I am familiar with it: I made it. :-)
What don't you like about it?
Jon
giggle
Sorry;)
LeeE
On 11/26/03 at 7:32 PM Jon Stockill wrote:
Is there any chance that a centreline could be displayed on the taxiway
segments? It'd make lining up very small square sections a lot easier,
rather than having to check the properties every time (if this isn't
possible for all the segments is it
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
This and your examples (mouse handling, etc.) have totally
won me over! I've already written my first nasal script
I haven't had time to play with NASAL yet, but now that it's integrated and
people seem to like it, it's probably time to start refactoring FlightGear a
bit.
* David Megginson -- Wednesday 26 November 2003 23:03:
If anyone wants to start on some analysis and make a few suggestions, or
even rewrite some code [...]
Not exactly what you meant, but I've written a syntax definition
file for vim that displays nasal scripts with colored syntax --
for
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Lee Elliott wrote:
You said If anyone has any requests I'd be happy to add them or move them
up the list. :)
Not an RAF field but I've noticed that London Stanstead (EGSS) appears to
have been sunk about 50ft into the ground...
OK, I'll have a look and see what I can
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Blender 2.30 is ok for ac3d files. read :
http://www.seedwiki.com/page.cfm?doc=ModelerAndSceneryBuilderDocumentation;
wikiid=2418wpid=0
-Fred
Thank you,
those scripts work great.
Best Regards,
Oliver C.
___
Lee Elliott worte:
You said If anyone has any requests I'd be happy to add them or move them
up the list. :)
Not an RAF field but I've noticed that London Stanstead (EGSS) appears to
have been sunk about 50ft into the ground...
The same happened with EDGM.
Best Regards,
Oliver C.
* David Megginson -- Wednesday 26 November 2003 23:34:
Great. Let me know when you have time to port it from vim to an editor.
The other editor on my system that is capable of syntax coloring,
is kate. But I rarely use it, so I won't bother.
$ which emacs
$ which vi
/usr/bin/vi
m.
David Megginson wrote:
Great. Let me know when you have time to port it from vim to an
editor.
:)
There's already a nasal-mode.el, actually. It's attached; it's
previously been hidden in the source tarball on the nasal project
website.
It mostly works. I did it by taking a chainsaw to
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Ilja,
I people occasionally want to send new screen shots, please do. I
have a script that makes them very easy to add to the gallery page. I
can't promise that every submission will be posted on the web page,
but if you submit a picture that looks good, or shows
David Megginson wrote:
Originally, I defined actions using XML mainly because we didn't have
a scripting language, but ideally, we should share up the labour like
this:
XML = declarative
NASAL = imperative
Completely agree. Although it should be pointed out that there's
significant gray
Hi,
I am trying to recieve a message using SGSocket::read.
SGSocket::read returns zero bytes read until about the time
I am expecting the first message to be recieved. From here on
SGSocket::read returns that -1 bytes have been read from the socket.
I have looked around (simgear docs, plib)
I was just thinking (actually would be proud:)) if someone could add our
Slovenian flag to the FlightGear logo (Slovenia terrain in FG is
becoming more and more closer to the RL and I am planning to do some
extensive airport fixes to match the real ones as well). I also modeled
the J-22 Orao,
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:59:53 -0700
Seamus Thomas Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to recieve a message using SGSocket::read.
SGSocket::read returns zero bytes read until about the time
I am expecting the first message to be recieved. From here on
SGSocket::read returns
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:46:18 +0100
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Time to Refactor (was Re: Nasal
integration docs)
The other editor on my system that is capable of
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
I was just thinking (actually would be proud:)) if someone could add
our Slovenian flag to the FlightGear logo
I, for one, think it would be immensely cool if the flag bar grew over
time. If any revisions are going to be done to the list, though, it
should be pointed out
I output the error and I am getting:
Transport endpoint is not connected
The strange part is if I put '\n' at the end of the message and read with
'readline' the message is successfully recieved.
Is this a problem with 'read'?
Seamus
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Bernie Bright wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov
Andy Ross writes:
I, for one, think it would be immensely cool if the flag bar grew over
time. If any revisions are going to be done to the list, though, it
should be pointed out that there's no maple leaf on the existing
banner. Don't tell David.
I told Jon when he made the logo that if he
On Thursday 27 November 2003 01:25, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Andy Ross writes:
I, for one, think it would be immensely cool if the flag bar grew over
time. If any revisions are going to be done to the list, though, it
should be pointed out that there's no maple leaf on the existing
banner.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 03:43:59 +
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyway to turn the console output back on? I've learnt quite a
bit from looking at it and it's also helped me sort out a few problems.
I understand the desire to make it quieter but I'd like it to be
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 18:04:50 -0700
Seamus Thomas Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I output the error and I am getting:
Transport endpoint is not connected
From man recv
ENOTCONN
The socket is associated with a connection-oriented protocol and
has not been
This really doesn't seem like such a difficult subject to me.
If one were to use a crude approximation of a flat plane drawn out to
intersect the ray from the eye to the sun, it would work, but...
If you want to be really clever, use a spherical or spheroidal
approximation to determine where
56 matches
Mail list logo
