On Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2004 03:41, David Megginson wrote:
> > What is the best way (most supported, cross-platform) to turn an integer
> > into an STL string type? Or, even an ASCII char[]?
> >
> > It seems that itoa() is not totally common.
>
> snprintf() is in ISO C99 but not ANSI C -- you could
Jon Berndt wrote:
What is the best way (most supported, cross-platform) to turn an integer into an STL
string type? Or, even an ASCII char[]?
It seems that itoa() is not totally common.
snprintf() is in ISO C99 but not ANSI C -- you could check to see if all of
the target platforms have it. ANSI
Hi Josh
Josh Babcock writes
I think that there is already stuff out there that does not conform to
this, but if enough people here agree, I would be happy to chase down all
those potential conflicts and mitigate them.
I think that would be a good idea there seems to be enough room
on the keybo
What is the best way (most supported, cross-platform) to turn an integer into an STL
string type? Or, even an ASCII char[]?
It seems that itoa() is not totally common.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/
On Wed, 26 May 2004 14:47:36 -0500
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, there are some inconsistancies with Robin's latest data ... many of
>
> these have been reported, hopefully he will clean these up and do a new
> db release soon.
Thanks, sorry, didn't know these were known
On Wed, 26 May 2004 14:32:43 -0700 (PDT), Alex wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://www.livejournal.com/users/debaday/
..they've also done whitespace. ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenari
http://www.livejournal.com/users/debaday/
Tuesday, May 25th, 2004
flightgear - Flight Gear Flight Simulator
This thing is huge. This package comes to our attention from Paul, a student at
Griffith University in Australia. Paul says that this very large OpenGL flight
simulator requires eleven CDR
Durk Talsma wrote:
However, until we are at that point of sophistication, I would rather see some
standard approach and departure patterns being used than nothing at all.
I agree. Unfortunately, you will find that many SIDs consist of something
along the lines of
- fly runway heading
- maintai
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 19:15, David Megginson wrote:
> The reason they don't work in real life is that everyone is flying at a
> different speed. There's typically one STAR for every arrival direction
> (often centred around a major intersection or navaid), but ATC has IFR
> traffic ranging fro
A couple of interesting 'links' here
http://www.physics.ubc.ca/%7Ewaltham/aero.html
Norman
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Yes, there are some inconsistancies with Robin's latest data ... many of
these have been reported, hopefully he will clean these up and do a new
db release soon.
Curt.
Chris Metzler wrote:
Hi. The new airport data has duplicate entries for a lot of airports.
It looks like in some cases, data fo
Hi. The new airport data has duplicate entries for a lot of airports.
It looks like in some cases, data for airports changed -- runways
got moved or rotated, new taxiways got added, etc. -- so an entire
new set of data for the airport went in, while the old one was still
listed. There are some d
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Airports
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv21708
> Modified Files:
> basic.dat.gz runways.dat.gz
> Log Message:
> Updated airport, runway, taxiway, windsock, beacon, and tower data.
Curt, would you _please_ :-) manually ch
Chris Metzler wrote:
Hi. I just downloaded the new airport basic/runways files from CVS
(thanks Curt!). I noticed that KSQL is no longer in the files at
all. The airport itself still seems to exist in the real world (hehe).
Was it removed from Robin Peel's data? Or was it never there, and was
a
Hi. I just downloaded the new airport basic/runways files from CVS
(thanks Curt!). I noticed that KSQL is no longer in the files at
all. The airport itself still seems to exist in the real world (hehe).
Was it removed from Robin Peel's data? Or was it never there, and was
an airport that we've
Durk Talsma wrote:
In February Erik Hofman mentioned that Robin Peel maintains a database of
airway data, for shared use between x-plane and FlightGear. I was wondering
if there's also a database of SID and STAR procedures that we could use? The
reason I'm asking is that these might be extremel
A good updated version of the Scenery Tutorial is here:
http://glennm.orcon.net.nz/flightgear/fg-scenery-tutorial2.html
Not sure why this has not been adopted on the main site.
Earlier in the year I had some success with a simple method of placing
photo scenery here are some results:
http://fre
Durk Talsma wrote:
In February Erik Hofman mentioned that Robin Peel maintains a database of
airway data, for shared use between x-plane and FlightGear. I was wondering
if there's also a database of SID and STAR procedures that we could use? The
reason I'm asking is that these might be extremel
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi Guys
The other day I stumbled on the keyboard map for
FG, can't find it at present,and I noticed quite a few
keys that have not been alocated yet.
I was wondering if a block of say ten keys could be
put aside and labeled aircraft specific for things like
tail hooks, A/C d
In February Erik Hofman mentioned that Robin Peel maintains a database of
airway data, for shared use between x-plane and FlightGear. I was wondering
if there's also a database of SID and STAR procedures that we could use? The
reason I'm asking is that these might be extremely useful in develop
Hi Guys
The other day I stumbled on the keyboard map for
FG, can't find it at present,and I noticed quite a few
keys that have not been alocated yet.
I was wondering if a block of say ten keys could be
put aside and labeled aircraft specific for things like
tail hooks, A/C doors, refueling booms an
Terraserver.homeadvisor.msn.com has aerial photographs of the US and
Alaska down to 1m resolution (though most of it is 10yrs old, for
obvious reasons). Most of the US and Alaska, at least. No, we can't get
photo-scenery for Groom Lake.
They get the photographs from USGS, but I can't find out if
22 matches
Mail list logo
