* Mathias Fröhlich -- Friday 08 October 2004 19:25:
Bug with display lists or bug with my patch?
The crease patch causes another small problem: The 737 is completely
unsmoothed.
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
During digging for that adf.ac stuff I have done some minor adjustmens to that
patch.
Things like not storing texture coordinate arrays when there is no texture
attached to that object and such.
The updated patch is attached.
Wolfram, this is the current one :)
Greetings and Thanks
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 09 October 2004 10:19:
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Friday 08 October 2004 19:25:
Bug with display lists or bug with my patch?
The crease patch causes another small problem: The 737 is completely
unsmoothed.
But not with your most recent patch. Here both the 3D adf
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 09 October 2004 10:45:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 09 October 2004 10:19:
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Friday 08 October 2004 19:25:
Bug with display lists or bug with my patch?
The crease patch causes another small problem: The 737 is completely
unsmoothed.
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Saturday 09 October 2004 10:38:
On Samstag 09 Oktober 2004 10:19, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
The crease patch causes another small problem: The 737 is completely
unsmoothed.
Yes, the A320 too.
That patch honours the flat shaded/smooth shaded flag from the ac3d files.
Melchior FRANZ a écrit :
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 08 October 2004 18:33:
I've tried using display lists again (which didn't work in the past) and
on my O2 I get a great improvement (up to 30%, but that only means from
6 fps to 9 fps in my case), but on my Linux machine I get a floating
point
Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
On Samstag 09 Oktober 2004 10:19, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Friday 08 October 2004 19:25:
Bug with display lists or bug with my patch?
The crease patch causes another small problem: The 737 is completely
unsmoothed.
Yes, the A320
John Wojnaroski wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Buildiing/running the ATC network test
John Wojnaroski wrote:
Build the TNL
:)
The windows binary for this patch is here :
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/fgfs-0.9.6-20041009.zip
-Fred
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
- Original Message -
From: Jon Stockill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 3:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Buildiing/running the ATC network test
OK, I had chance to have a look at configure.in and
John Wojnaroski wrote:
BTW, for those participating in the test later today, you can run multiple
instance of the controllers and pilots which will help to increase the
traffic load on the master server as nodes connect/disconnect and reconnect.
The more, the merrier...
Well I'm hanging around in
Wolfram Kuss wrote:
Is there a reason that models in the base package are not optimised by
calling merge hierarchy nodes and possibly by calling stripify and
then put into the base package in a file format like ssg that will
keep the optimisations?
.ssg is not endian safe.
Erik
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
On Samstag 09 Oktober 2004 10:19, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Friday 08 October 2004 19:25:
Bug with display lists or bug with my patch?
The crease patch causes another small problem: The 737 is completely
unsmoothed.
Yes, the A320 too.
13 matches
Mail list logo