[Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Alex Romosan -- Saturday 30 April 2005 00:43: [JSBSim groundcache() patch] > i strongly second committing the patches to cvs (and the fa-18, of > course). As far as I've understood: the former doesn't make sense at the moment, and the latter is impossible. 1. JSBSim is not maintained in fgfs' c

[Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread Alex Romosan
ghours <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Melchior FRANZ a écrit : >> * ghours -- Friday 29 April 2005 22:36: >> [ground cache for JSBSim] >> >>>Yes the patches are welcome . >>>from where is it possible to get these patches ? >> ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/carrier/ >> You only need

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread ghours
Melchior FRANZ a écrit : * ghours -- Friday 29 April 2005 22:36: [ground cache for JSBSim] Yes the patches are welcome . from where is it possible to get these patches ? ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/carrier/ You only need the JSBSim diff (and the FA18, of course :-). I don't kno

[Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* ghours -- Friday 29 April 2005 22:36: [ground cache for JSBSim] > Yes the patches are welcome . > from where is it possible to get these patches ? ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/carrier/ You only need the JSBSim diff (and the FA18, of course :-). I don't know it the diff does s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread ghours
Melchior FRANZ a écrit : * ghours -- Friday 29 April 2005 19:04: An Aircraft with FDM YASIM does work correctly when we try to land on Nimitz: the solid material is active. An Aircraft with FDM JSB does not work the solid material is not active. [...] Does anybody could explain that problem. Tha

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Disabling the top menu

2005-04-29 Thread Ben Morrison
Thanks that is exactly what I needed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melchior FRANZ Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 1:45 PM To: flightgear-devel@flightgear.org Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Disabling the top menu * Ben Morrison -- Friday 2

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Disabling the top menu

2005-04-29 Thread Ben Morrison
Is it possible to do this from the command prompt? I don't want the user to have to press F10. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver C. Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 3:40 PM To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-de

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Disabling the top menu

2005-04-29 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Ben Morrison -- Friday 29 April 2005 20:34: > Is it possible to hide the menu at the top of the screen? Sure. F10 toggles it. If you want it disabled everytime you start fgfs, you can put this into one of the xml configuration files: ... false ... or

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Disabling the top menu

2005-04-29 Thread Oliver C.
On Friday 29 April 2005 18:34, Ben Morrison wrote: > Is it possible to hide the menu at the top of the screen? Yes, press F10. Best Regards, Oliver C. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman

[Flightgear-devel] Disabling the top menu

2005-04-29 Thread Ben Morrison
Is it possible to hide the menu at the top of the screen? ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

RE: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC 7.1 Runtime Error

2005-04-29 Thread Ben Morrison
It's not very clear. Check that you added the '--fg-root=x:\flightgear\data' parameter to the debugger, not finding the airports/runway data can lead FG to an infinite loop for example. Or just press break and look where he is in the code ;) Harald. Ok, it turns out it was initializing it jus

Re: [Flightgear-devel] nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread ghours
Erik Hofman a écrit : ghours wrote: G-ROBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] An Aircraft with FDM YASIM does work correctly when we try to land on Nimitz: the solid material is active. An Aircraft with FDM JSB does not work the solid material is not active. I test it with SeafireIIIC (yasim) and c172r (jsb), t

[Flightgear-devel] Re: nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* ghours -- Friday 29 April 2005 19:04: > An Aircraft with FDM YASIM does work correctly when we try to land on > Nimitz: the solid material is active. > An Aircraft with FDM JSB does not work the solid material is not active. [...] > Does anybody could explain that problem. That's simple: Mathi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread Erik Hofman
ghours wrote: G-ROBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] An Aircraft with FDM YASIM does work correctly when we try to land on Nimitz: the solid material is active. An Aircraft with FDM JSB does not work the solid material is not active. I test it with SeafireIIIC (yasim) and c172r (jsb), this one go through th

[Flightgear-devel] nimitz ai model : solid material, versus yasim jsb

2005-04-29 Thread ghours
G-ROBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] An Aircraft with FDM YASIM does work correctly when we try to land on Nimitz: the solid material is active. An Aircraft with FDM JSB does not work the solid material is not active. I test it with SeafireIIIC (yasim) and c172r (jsb), this one go through the deck like bu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC 7.1 Runtime Error

2005-04-29 Thread Harald JOHNSEN
Ben Morrison wrote: Thanks, guys. This is my first time posting to the board and I am impressed with the response times. I am compiling in debug mode because I am going to be modifying flightgear later. Ok, Harald's solution fixed the runtime error but now flightgear just sits there and doesn't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: RFC: Eliminating jitter

2005-04-29 Thread Erik Hofman
Jim Wilson wrote: From: Erik Hofman As the last writer/rewriter of the viewer (and therefore partly responsible for the bug being there) I probably should look at it, but it will be a few days yet. This is too good to wait on and it sounds like it passes the acid tests, so yeah go for it! Done. E

RE: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC 7.1 Runtime Error

2005-04-29 Thread Ben Morrison
Thanks, guys. This is my first time posting to the board and I am impressed with the response times. I am compiling in debug mode because I am going to be modifying flightgear later. Ok, Harald's solution fixed the runtime error but now flightgear just sits there and doesn't start. What could b

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC 7.1 Runtime Error

2005-04-29 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Harald JOHNSEN wrote : Ben Morrison wrote: I have downloaded the following source code files: FlightGear 9.8, SimGear 3.8, plib 1.8.4, and zlib 1.1.4. I was able to get this to compile in Visual Studio 2003 but when I try to run flight gear with the following command: “fgfs –fg-root=c:\\GS_PTT\\

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC 7.1 Runtime Error

2005-04-29 Thread Harald JOHNSEN
Ben Morrison wrote: I have downloaded the following source code files: FlightGear 9.8, SimGear 3.8, plib 1.8.4, and zlib 1.1.4. I was able to get this to compile in Visual Studio 2003 but when I try to run flight gear with the following command: “fgfs –fg-root=c:\\GS_PTT\\Flightgear\\data –airp

[Flightgear-devel] MSVC 7.1 Runtime Error

2005-04-29 Thread Ben Morrison
I have downloaded the following source code files:  FlightGear 9.8, SimGear 3.8, plib 1.8.4, and zlib 1.1.4.  I was able to get this to compile in Visual Studio 2003 but when I try to run flight gear with the following command: “fgfs –fg-root=c:\\GS_PTT\\Flightgear\\data –airport=KSFO – air

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: RFC: Eliminating jitter

2005-04-29 Thread Jim Wilson
> From: Erik Hofman > > Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > * Erik Hofman -- Friday 29 April 2005 09:38: > > > >>By teleporting I think Jim means selecting different airports across the > >>world (one after another), i.e. KSFO, CYYR, EHAM, etc. > > > > Yes, probably. Works without the least problems. >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: RFC: Eliminating jitter

2005-04-29 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Erik Hofman wrote : Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Erik Hofman -- Friday 29 April 2005 09:38: By teleporting I think Jim means selecting different airports across the world (one after another), i.e. KSFO, CYYR, EHAM, etc. Yes, probably. Works without the least problems. Ok, I tried it and liked it. Can

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: RFC: Eliminating jitter

2005-04-29 Thread Erik Hofman
Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Erik Hofman -- Friday 29 April 2005 09:38: By teleporting I think Jim means selecting different airports across the world (one after another), i.e. KSFO, CYYR, EHAM, etc. Yes, probably. Works without the least problems. Ok, I tried it and liked it. Can we agree this should

[Flightgear-devel] Re: RFC: Eliminating jitter

2005-04-29 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 29 April 2005 09:38: > By teleporting I think Jim means selecting different airports across the > world (one after another), i.e. KSFO, CYYR, EHAM, etc. Yes, probably. Works without the least problems. m. ___ Flightgear-devel m

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RFC: Eliminating jitter

2005-04-29 Thread Erik Hofman
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: With teleporting I am not shure what you mean. By teleporting I think Jim means selecting different airports across the world (one after another), i.e. KSFO, CYYR, EHAM, etc. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-deve

RE: [Flightgear-devel] (no subject)

2005-04-29 Thread Vivian Meazza
Mostyn Gale asked > Just two quick questions. What effect do gauges have on the frame rates of > virtual cockpits. i.e. is there as strong effect after 10 or 20 gauges? 3d gauges - yes the vertex count is significant, but not the number of gauges per se. > Also is it possible to configure the