> Well, if my hackery here must server as a reference for that, I think we
> should improove the framework around that stuff and we should
> document that
> better.
> By improoving that framework, I can well imagine to abstract from
> the vector
> classes provided from plib, so that for that time
Hi all!
Yes, I know this topic has already been discussed and I know
also that someone of you is working on the FG multiplayer code...
anyway I think that it will be an advantage to the FG comunity to
interface to IVAO and/or VATSIM networks. Ok, They don't want that a
GPL tools is used to inte
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Yes, I know this topic has already been discussed and I know
also that someone of you is working on the FG multiplayer code...
anyway I think that it will be an advantage to the FG comunity to
interface to IVAO and/or VATSIM networks. Ok, They don't want that a
On Sunday 14 August 2005 21:56, Erik Hofman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all!
> > Yes, I know this topic has already been discussed and I know
> > also that someone of you is working on the FG multiplayer code...
> > anyway I think that it will be an advantage to the FG comunity to
> >
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> [...] I think that it will be an advantage to the FG comunity to
> interface to IVAO and/or VATSIM networks. Ok, They don't want that a
> GPL tools is used to interface their network for secutity reasons
For security reasons ? What a joke Indeed, participating
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/BAC-TSR2/Models
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv26968/Models
> Modified Files:
> BAC-TSR2-model.xml
[...]
I really like this aircraft - it spreads some sort of 'charisma', very
much like the Concorde !
Thanks,
Hello all,
I've just been having a problem with FG failing to start when
real-weather-fetch is enabled and the "METAR data is too old"
At least, that's the message I'm getting when I set the log-level
to warn. I thought FG would try for a while and then start with
real-weather-fetch disabled
It's not about security
jvrvez wrote:
> Ok, They don't want that a GPL tools is used to interface their
> network for secutity reasons (I think this is understandable)
> anyway why can't we join their network with their own code?
This is a non-starter. There is simply no way to make this work,
s
You might want to go back and check the email archives almost a year
ago. We had discussions with the VATSIMfolks and it went nowhere. There
was some thought of starting a development for FG using the TNL
libraries, set up a small network test, but it all faded away due to
lack of interest...
