So my question is: What is more important to FlightGear buildings
or planes?
I never made a 3D model of a plane before but AC3D looks so nice
I think I
could come up with something.
Buildings. I can't see how any sane person could say Planes (I could be
wrong, though ;-) I like to be PIC
Hmm. I got them. I don't know what could have happened.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Olveyra
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:01 PM
To: FlightGear Devel
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] And the CVS change notifications?
Both of them. It is ugly too see an empty airport. An airport filled not
only with buildings but also with planes on ground would bring an airport
to life.
Next time you fly around look out the window. What do you see more of by
far? In fact, for great distances you may not see any aircraft.
Next time you fly around look out the window. What do you see more of by
far? In fact, for great distances you may not see any aircraft.
You see aircraft three ways ...
Yes, of course. You are kind of biased, though - given what you want to do
with the sim. The scene - no matter which
In fact, it you're going to fuss about a change in CG or drag when the
gear
cycles ( about 4-10 secs) then you should really do something about
realistic engine performance for a two or three hour cruise. Might I
suggest
some sort of random number generator, throw the dice for each engine,
David M. is correct.
That drag would already be built into the coefficients, I'd expect.
All the best,
David
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Right engine won't start with fresh checkout from simgear and flightgear and
using JSBSim CVS files. Tried all combinations of misture, throttle, etc.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears as though we've been going too fast ! ;-) There seems to be a
few things that are not in sync. Maybe we need to hold off on new changes
for a few days and iron out the directory structure?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
So then, to migrate changes in JSBSim.cpp to JSBSim.cxx is a manual
process??
This is not something one would normally do. JSBSim.cpp is sort of a
driver program that initializes an instance of FGFDMExec and then reads a
script or an initialization file and just runs (calls a FGFDMExec::Run()
You are not using JSBSim from JSBSim CVS are you?
No, from the FlightGear CVS. Is anyone able to fly the C172 from
today's FlightGear CVS (I know most of you Americans are away at
your Thanksgiving)?
I flew it today. I did a full checkout and rebuild of everything. Seemed to
work fine.
Is the scenery server down?
Which one do you mean ?
My one is up, for all three services.
I meant the graphical scenery downloader at flightgear.org. Both the http
and ftp download methods had timed out on me several times. I got what I
needed, though.
Jon
Jon sent me some ideas by private mail, and they look workable -- it
really comes down to a judgement call about how frequently the
messages will be used. If they're relatively infrequent (say, less
than a few every second, as seems the case), then we should optimize
for ease of coding
no terrain intersection
no terrain intersection
load() base = /usr/local/lib/FlightGear/Scenery
Loading tile
/usr/local/lib/FlightGear/Scenery/w180n1879048190/w180n1879048191/5712
This is (most likely) caused by the current lack of crash protection in
JSBSim. What's happening here
501 - 513 of 513 matches
Mail list logo
