Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
I think it depends on what platform you are running. The best solution would
be to use 'awk' and stick to the least common denominator in the command
set,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about
Martin Spott wrote:
Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
I think it depends on what platform you are running. The best solution would
be to use 'awk' and stick to the least common denominator in the command
set,
That's what I do:
awk -F';' '{print $1=$2}'
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know, maybe it's just me but I've written a lot of perl I
couldn't read a month later ...
You just haven't rewired your brain chemistry yet. After about 12
years, perl code starts to look normal and everything else (C/C++, the
sky, your family) looks strange.
--- David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know, maybe it's just me but I've written a lot of perl I
couldn't read a month later ...
You just haven't rewired your brain chemistry yet. After about 12
years, perl code starts to look normal and everything
David Megginson wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know, maybe it's just me but I've written a lot of perl I
couldn't read a month later ...
You just haven't rewired your brain chemistry yet. After about 12
years, perl code starts to look normal and everything else (C/C++, the
sky, your
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Tony Peden writes:
I don't know, maybe it's just me but I've written a lot of perl I
couldn't read a month later ...
You just haven't rewired your brain chemistry yet. After about 12
years, perl code starts to look normal and everything else
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
??
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like extracting a particular set of fields from each line
of an input stream.)
I'd recommend learning perl or python or both as replacements. :-)
Curt.
--
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
All the best,
David
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:31:11 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
David
I'm going to take a wild guess here: I'll bet you and Curt
didn't do to well in multiple choice tests in school?
;-)
Jon
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:17, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like extracting a particular set of fields from each line
of an input stream.)
I'd recommend
Tony Peden writes:
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:17, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like extracting a particular set of fields from each line
of an input
Jon S Berndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
??
Well I'm going to throw in the old it depends on what you are doing. Since
I've been around longer than perl, I still use awk for a lot of one line
stuff. For example it often works better than xargs (piped out
On Thursday 04 September 2003 23:39, Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:31:11 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
David
I'm going to take a wild guess here: I'll bet you and Curt
Lee Elliott writes:
On Thursday 04 September 2003 23:39, Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:31:11 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
perl
David
I'm going to take a wild
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:06, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Tony Peden writes:
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 15:17, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Which is better:
awk
gawk
nawk
Those are for the old geezers :-) and the occasional quick command
line hack (like
16 matches
Mail list logo
