Jim Wilson wrote:
Actually it doesn't seem to do that either (not, as you say, it would do that
much good). And no, another thread on how to do email or whatever is not
required. But I feel compelled to ask how hard it could possibly be for the
software to simply filter email addresses out.
> From: Melchior FRANZ
>
> > Even better would be a filter on the mailing list software to parse out
> > email addresses in message bodies.
>
> Well, it does. But it only replaces @ with " at ". And I would be very
> surprised if the harvesters wouldn't be "clever" enough to detect
> as address
