Re: [Flightgear-devel] Another pre-release consideration

2003-06-04 Thread Jon S Berndt
On 03 Jun 2003 15:30:46 -0700 Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The roll trim was bound to the yaw trim props and vice-versa. Probably the fault of the guy who did the properties for JSBSim, can't remember his name offhand, though, ... Well, we'll have to dock his pay when we find out who he

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Another pre-release consideration

2003-06-04 Thread Tony Peden
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 13:18, Jon S Berndt wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:08:50 -0400 > David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Here's something else to worry about before the release: > >a recent bug fix in JSBSim > > ?? Which fix ?? The roll trim was bound to the yaw trim props and vice

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Another pre-release consideration

2003-06-04 Thread Jim Wilson
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Here's something else to worry about before the release: a recent bug > fix in JSBSim meant that all of the JSBSim-based propeller planes are > now badly out of trim. I fixed the default C172P, but I need to know > what else people actually fly, so that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Another pre-release consideration

2003-06-04 Thread Jon S Berndt
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:08:50 -0400 David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here's something else to worry about before the release: a recent bug fix in JSBSim ?? Which fix ?? meant that all of the JSBSim-based propeller planes are now badly out of trim. I fixed the default C172P, but I need

[Flightgear-devel] Another pre-release consideration

2003-06-04 Thread David Megginson
Here's something else to worry about before the release: a recent bug fix in JSBSim meant that all of the JSBSim-based propeller planes are now badly out of trim. I fixed the default C172P, but I need to know what else people actually fly, so that I can fix it for the release. Try out a few, and l