Jon Berndt said:
I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms I'm
working on,
Just so I am clear, when you say fdms are you referring to Flight Dynamics
Model source
code, or are you referring to something I'd call an Aircraft Flight Model
(AFM) or
Aircraft
Jim Wilson wrote:
If it wasn't for the great work on JSBsim and YASim we'd have very
few aircraft. But I think those config files, along with the source
code that ends up interpreting and processing them, both make up the
FDMs.
There is considerable skill and effort involved in producing
On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wojnaroski wrote:
When using real-time weather via the net and the native-ctrls interface to
input control data to FG it appears both sources attempt to write to the
environmental properties; this is most noticeable with the wind vector and
discontinuities in
I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms I'm
working on,
Just so I am clear, when you say fdms are you referring to Flight Dynamics Model
source
code, or are you referring to something I'd call an Aircraft Flight Model (AFM) or
Aircraft Flight Model Definition
On Saturday 31 July 2004 17:02, Jon Berndt wrote:
I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms
I'm working on,
Just so I am clear, when you say fdms are you referring to Flight
Dynamics Model source code, or are you referring to something I'd call an
Aircraft
- Original Message -
From: Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Data source battle?
On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wojnaroski wrote:
When using real-time weather
When using real-time weather via the net and the native-ctrls interface to
input control data to FG it appears both sources attempt to write to the
environmental properties; this is most noticeable with the wind vector and
discontinuities in the ground speed
turning off the specific wind
