Releasing flares on the f16 did not work anymore. Thanks to Joacim and
vivian we have a cure for this.
Patch attached.
Nine
Index: f16-set.xml
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/f16/f16-set.xml,v
retrieving revision
Jon Berndt wrote:
Ok. The first thing I will try is to see if I can get the PID
controllers to work correctly again. If that fails we can always look
further into it.
Something wierd is also going on with alpha that may have had to do with changes to
FGAuxiliary.
I think I'm on to it.
Further disc
> Ok. The first thing I will try is to see if I can get the PID
> controllers to work correctly again. If that fails we can always look
> further into it.
Something wierd is also going on with alpha that may have had to do with changes to
FGAuxiliary.
Jon
___
Jon Berndt wrote:
I might add that my changes were to fix things that really were broken.
Which might be the reason the F-16 is left broken right now. Maybe it
was relying on broken code too much in the past?
That thought did occur to me. I did correct the way some filters were done.
Pk. The firs
> > I might add that my changes were to fix things that really were broken.
>
> Which might be the reason the F-16 is left broken right now. Maybe it
> was relying on broken code too much in the past?
That thought did occur to me. I did correct the way some filters were done.
Jon
Jon Berndt wrote:
Erik's F-16 has been around for a while, and working.
So, it may be some change I made
recently. There have been a few changes to the FCS.
Jon
I might add that my changes were to fix things that really were broken.
Which might be the reason the F-16 is left broken right now. Mayb
> Erik's F-16 has been around for a while, and working.
> So, it may be some change I made
> recently. There have been a few changes to the FCS.
>
> Jon
I might add that my changes were to fix things that really were broken.
:-)
Jon
___
Flightgear-d
> > Since the JSBSIM update some days ago the f16 model stopped working
> > properly for me. The elevator appears to be oscillating randomly, it's
> > seemingly in a different position for each frame update.
>
> ..the real thing does this too.
Erik's F-16 has been around for a while, and working.
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:03:35 -0700, Istvan wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Since the JSBSIM update some days ago the f16 model stopped working
> properly for me. The elevator appears to be oscillating randomly, it's
> seemingly in a different position for each frame update.
..the real t
Istvan Marko wrote:
Since the JSBSIM update some days ago the f16 model stopped working
properly for me. The elevator appears to be oscillating randomly, it's
seemingly in a different position for each frame update. This is
visible in the model animation and the aircraft is uncontrollable.
Does any
Since the JSBSIM update some days ago the f16 model stopped working
properly for me. The elevator appears to be oscillating randomly, it's
seemingly in a different position for each frame update. This is
visible in the model animation and the aircraft is uncontrollable.
Does anyone else see this?
Richard Bytheway wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that the F16 rudder acts in the opposite direction to all other aircraft?
I've never noticed it and it should be right.
Does anybody else notice this?
Or is it just my system?
I can't possibly think of a way that makes it system specific?
Erik
_
Has anyone else noticed that the F16 rudder acts in the opposite direction to all
other aircraft?
Or is it just my system?
Richard Bytheway
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
David Culp wrote:
Erik wrote:
*Then it might have been me ;-)
Bueno, Erik! Here's what I've done to the panel. I had to shave off the top
and bottom a little for visibility "over the nose". I then added some HUD
brackets, and converted it to RGB format. The (huge) file is here:
You ar
Erik wrote:
> *Then it might have been me ;-)
Bueno, Erik! Here's what I've done to the panel. I had to shave off the top
and bottom a little for visibility "over the nose". I then added some HUD
brackets, and converted it to RGB format. The (huge) file is here:
http://home.attbi.com/~davi
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:54:32 -
"Jim Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I didn't really look at this to see why (just figured it wasn't done) but
>it seems to be a gear modeling issue. The mains seem to trim at ground
>level fine. A minor issue though, if the model isn't flyable yet :-)
I
Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> looks promising. Unfortunately it lacks the front gear and I hardly
> manage to get it into the air:
>
> http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/F16_01.png
This is what I see as well with the aircraft at zero throttle sitting on the
threshol
> I don't pay much attention to the jets in FlightGear, so I might be
> behind a bit here, but isn't the F-16 inherently aerodynamically
> unstable? [...]
It _should_ be flyable - although it's pretty difficult to start with the
nose in the ground. It's also pretty difficult to jump into the air
Martin Spott wrote:
> looks promising. Unfortunately it lacks the front gear and I hardly
> manage to get it into the air:
>
I've sent an update to both Jon and Tony which should make it almost
flyable. In other words: the F-16 needs more work ...
;-)
Erik
> The F-16 is neutrally stable. It is not unflyable without its SAS, the
> pilot just has to work harder at it. If the FCS of the real thing has a
> direct mode (i.e. the control surfaces do exactly as commanded by the
> pilot with no adjustments made by the computer), this is probably what
> it
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 04:21, David Megginson wrote:
> Martin Spott writes:
>
> > looks promising. Unfortunately it lacks the front gear and I hardly
> > manage to get it into the air:
> >
> > http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/F16_01.png
>
> I don't pay much attention to t
Martin Spott writes:
> looks promising. Unfortunately it lacks the front gear and I hardly
> manage to get it into the air:
>
> http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/F16_01.png
I don't pay much attention to the jets in FlightGear, so I might be
behind a bit here, but isn't th
looks promising. Unfortunately it lacks the front gear and I hardly
manage to get it into the air:
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/bitmap/FGFS/F16_01.png
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
-
23 matches
Mail list logo
