On Tuesday 30 April 2002 10:04 pm, David Megginson wrote:
> John Check writes:
> > I'd prefer Aircraft/Aero/whatever. When you think about it, everything
> > in a Aircraft/whatever directory except the jsb config file is cosmetic.
> > A clear division there is a good thing
>
> That sounds great
John Check writes:
> I'd prefer Aircraft/Aero/whatever. When you think about it, everything in a
> Aircraft/whatever directory except the jsb config file is cosmetic.
> A clear division there is a good thing
That sounds great, actually, as long as we don't end up with a plane
named the "Aer
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 8:52 pm, David Megginson wrote:
> John Check writes:
> > I started integrating the UIUC stuff into Aircraft/
> > and part of Michaels strategy is a Aircraft/UIUC
> > for the UIUC configs.
> > While we're at it how about moving the Aircraft-yasim
> > directory the sam
John Check writes:
> I started integrating the UIUC stuff into Aircraft/
> and part of Michaels strategy is a Aircraft/UIUC
> for the UIUC configs.
> While we're at it how about moving the Aircraft-yasim
> directory the same way? Comments?
Sounds good. I wonder if something like this wo
I started integrating the UIUC stuff into Aircraft/
and part of Michaels strategy is a Aircraft/UIUC
for the UIUC configs.
While we're at it how about moving the Aircraft-yasim
directory the same way? Comments?
TTYL
J
___
Flightgear-devel mailing li
