subject:"\[Flightgear\-devel\] Minor \- fgadmin"

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor - fgadmin

2004-03-20 Thread Curtis L. Olson

Alex Perry wrote: Is the "utils/fgadmin" supposed to be portable selfcontained code? It references a bunch of header files that are not in its own tree and are not part of FLTK version 1.0.11-5 that's in Debian Stable. Should there be a version number check inserted into configure? It is intend

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Minor - fgadmin

2004-03-20 Thread Frederic Bouvier

Alex Perry wrote: > Is the "utils/fgadmin" supposed to be portable selfcontained code? > It references a bunch of header files that are not in its own tree > and are not part of FLTK version 1.0.11-5 that's in Debian Stable. > Should there be a version number check inserted into configure? > > so

[Flightgear-devel] Minor - fgadmin

2004-03-20 Thread Alex Perry

Is the "utils/fgadmin" supposed to be portable selfcontained code? It references a bunch of header files that are not in its own tree and are not part of FLTK version 1.0.11-5 that's in Debian Stable. Should there be a version number check inserted into configure? source='fgadmin.cxx' object='fgad