Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: First real flight

2003-11-01 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On 30 Oct 2003 14:01:22 +, Matthew Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Given the difficulty of getting in and out of a 152 on the ground it's probably impossible at our circuit height of 800ft to survive a bailout. A larger aircraft at 1000ft and reasonable

re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: First real flight

2003-10-30 Thread David Megginson
Matthew Law writes: I agree :-) In a C152 with one aboard it certainly gets a little bumpy around the circuit even nauseous sometimes. The worst turbulence I've been in so far was just beneath a bank of fluffy cumulus clouds. I thought the airframe was going to fail and for the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: First real flight

2003-10-30 Thread David Megginson
Frederic Bouvier writes: I am trying to avoid to fly on the afternoon in summer. It even happened that my head hit the top of the canopy. I wouldn't imagine what could happen if I'd forgot to fasten my seat belt. Been there -- I bruised my head on the roof of my Warrior during a practice

re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: First real flight

2003-10-30 Thread Matthew Law
Given the difficulty of getting in and out of a 152 on the ground it's probably impossible at our circuit height of 800ft to survive a bailout. A larger aircraft at 1000ft and reasonable speed, say 100kts, would be quite survivable. The key is the airspeed. You'd get a far faster deployment at

[Flightgear-devel] Re: First real flight

2003-10-28 Thread Matthew Law
Congratulations, Lee! Will you be carrying on and getting a glider license? Turbulence sucks: when I'm flying, I usually try to climb out above it. Turbulence often means thermals and updrafts, though, so I imagine that soaring types actually go looking for it. The gusts disappear usually a few