[Flightgear-devel] Re: Flying under the bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Marcio Shimoda -- Tuesday 18 November 2003 16:00: Has somebody tried to fly under de Golden Gate? Here FG crashes after I do it. Really? FG crashes? Or just the plane. The latter is known and a feature. ;-) http://baron.me.umn.edu/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-August/020119.html m.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Flying under the bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Gene Buckle
Really? FG crashes? Or just the plane. The latter is known and a feature. ;-) http://baron.me.umn.edu/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-August/020119.html Well technically, it's a mis-feature... :) g. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Flying under the bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Marcio Shimoda
Really? FG crashes? Or just the plane. The latter is known and a feature. ;-) :) ... No, the simulator crashes http://baron.me.umn.edu/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-August/020119.html Thanks, for the tip. Marcio -- __ Sign-up for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Flying under the bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Gene Buckle writes: Really? FG crashes? Or just the plane. The latter is known and a feature. ;-) http://baron.me.umn.edu/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-August/020119.html Well technically, it's a mis-feature... :) Or even a desirable feature depending on who you ask. Curt. --

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Flying under the bridge

2003-11-18 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Curtis L. Olson -- Tuesday 18 November 2003 17:10: Gene Buckle writes: Well technically, it's a mis-feature... :) Or even a desirable feature depending on who you ask. Whereby the only valid argument would be simulator performance. Keeping people from simulating things that are too