Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Segmentation fault in FGTower -- ASI and nav still broken!

2003-03-12 Thread Major A
- ALL planes show a discrepancy between the HUD speed readout and ASI on the panel. If the HUD shows IAS, why does the ASI show less at altitude? (They agree at sea level.) The HUD shows CAS, actually. We're not modelling errors deliberately right now, but eventually the ASI

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Segmentation fault in FGTower -- ASI and nav still broken!

2003-03-12 Thread David Megginson
Major A writes: OK, but the IAS and CAS should be reasonably close to each other. I think the difference is simply too big, and it also increases with altitude like that between TAS and IAS should. I don't think 260 KIAS can lead to 320 KCAS at 12000ft, which I just got when flying the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Segmentation fault in FGTower -- ASI and nav still broken!

2003-03-12 Thread Major A
OK, but the IAS and CAS should be reasonably close to each other. I think the difference is simply too big, and it also increases with altitude like that between TAS and IAS should. I don't think 260 KIAS can lead to 320 KCAS at 12000ft, which I just got when flying the 747-yasim.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Segmentation fault in FGTower -- ASI and nav still broken!

2003-03-11 Thread Major A
My UUCP connection is broken this afternoon, so I can't directly reply to dave's mail. Nevertheless I tried his patch - yet without success: OK, I think I've fixed it now - if you could try it again that would be great. Seems to be OK now. I've just tested a few planes. Here is what I