On Friday 06 May 2005 16:12, Martin Spott wrote:
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> > I would like to keep this check around a little longer, until I'm more
> > convinced I got everything nailed down. If there are portability issues
> > though, I don't see any strong reasons for keeping it.
>
> It's your decis
Durk Talsma wrote:
> I would like to keep this check around a little longer, until I'm more
> convinced I got everything nailed down. If there are portability issues
> though, I don't see any strong reasons for keeping it.
It's your decision. If you want to keep it, then let's add the Solaris
w
Martin Spott wrote:
> If there's no suitable replacement for 'finite' then I'd suggest the
> following patch:
Alternatively we can just use something like the following (untested)
code. All modern CPUs (and certainly all the ones we support) use
IEEE format for their floating point values.
int f
On Friday 06 May 2005 14:00, Martin Spott wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > foehn: 13:47:11 ~> man finite
> > NAME
> > isnan, isnand, isnanf, finite, fpclass, unordered - deter-
> > mine type of floating-point number
> >
> > SYNOPSIS
> > #include
>
> If there's no suitable replacem
Martin Spott wrote:
> foehn: 13:47:11 ~> man finite
> NAME
> isnan, isnand, isnanf, finite, fpclass, unordered - deter-
> mine type of floating-point number
>
> SYNOPSIS
> #include
If there's no suitable replacement for 'finite' then I'd suggest the
following patch:
--- FlightG
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> $ man finite
> NAME
>isinf, isnan, finite - test for infinity or not-a-number (NaN)
>
> SYNOPSIS
>#include
Ooops :
foehn: 13:47:03 ~> uname -a
SunOS foehn 5.8 Generic_117000-03 sun4m sparc
foehn: 13:47:06 ~> find /usr/include/ -name math\.h
/usr/incl
* Martin Spott -- Friday 06 May 2005 08:33:
> where is 'finite' expected to be declared ? I don't find a matching
> declaration on my Solaris box:
$ man finite
NAME
isinf, isnan, finite - test for infinity or not-a-number (NaN)
SYNOPSIS
#include
int isinf(double value);
