Re: [Flightgear-devel] Samll windows bug?

2001-12-17 Thread Erik Hofman
Norman Vine wrote: > Erik Hofman writes: > >>I noticed that in SimGear/timing/timestamp.cxx for Windows the seconds >>are intitalized to zero while under Unix it initilized properly: >> > > You expect Windows and Unix to do things similarly ? I expected FlighGear/SimGear would use the same va

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Samll windows bug?

2001-12-16 Thread Norman Vine
Erik Hofman writes: > >I noticed that in SimGear/timing/timestamp.cxx for Windows the seconds >are intitalized to zero while under Unix it initilized properly: You expect Windows and Unix to do things similarly ? >Isn't this a problem? Only after running for 45 days or so :-) ie. secs_min*mins_

[Flightgear-devel] Samll windows bug?

2001-12-16 Thread Erik Hofman
Hi, I noticed that in SimGear/timing/timestamp.cxx for Windows the seconds are intitalized to zero while under Unix it initilized properly: if defined( WIN32 ) unsigned int t; t = timeGetTime(); seconds = 0; ^ usec = t * 1000; #elif defined( HAVE_GETTI