I might even be able to write a script to do that move.
> With a moderate amount of work, we can move all of those models to
> JSBSim. They won't be fully accurate, but they'll still be better
> than the UIUC versions.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailin
John Check writes:
> I'm curious, is the UIUC stuff destined for the bit bucket, you
> think? I don't recall ever seing anything new. Andy has been
> cranking out YASim planes at a pretty good pace. Not that I have a
> problem with Aircraft-uiuc, and it's definitely been a good source
> of
On Thursday 06 December 2001 1:35 pm, you wrote:
> David Megginson wrote:
> > Since we have the YASim FDM in the FlightGear source tree, it makes
> > sense to add Andy's four config files to the base package. Right
> > now, YASim looks for the config files in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft; that's
> > pro
On Thursday 06 December 2001 1:26 pm, you wrote:
> Since we have the YASim FDM in the FlightGear source tree, it makes
> sense to add Andy's four config files to the base package. Right now,
> YASim looks for the config files in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft; that's probably
> going to be a bit confusing, si
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> Ok, I have created $FG_ROOT/Aircraft-yasim and added the yasim xml
> files there. I will also do the corresponding code change.
I remove X15set.xml, since it wasn't from YASim (you must have copied
it from Aircraft/ accidentally).
All the best,
David
--
David M
David Megginson wrote:
> Since we have the YASim FDM in the FlightGear source tree, it makes
> sense to add Andy's four config files to the base package. Right
> now, YASim looks for the config files in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft; that's
> probably going to be a bit confusing, since the JSBSim models
Since we have the YASim FDM in the FlightGear source tree, it makes
sense to add Andy's four config files to the base package. Right now,
YASim looks for the config files in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft; that's probably
going to be a bit confusing, since the JSBSim models are in
subdirectories in the same l
