[Flightgear-devel] yasim(-test) vs fgfs

2005-12-02 Thread Joacim Persson
I've discovered a difference between how fgfs calls the yasim solver, and how the "yasim" binary (aka yasim-test) does it. I have a -yasim.xml which doesn't pass yasim(-test) but which fgfs accepts... ?:-P So what is the difference? Number of iterations? _

Re: [Flightgear-devel] yasim(-test) vs fgfs

2005-12-02 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
On Samstag 03 Dezember 2005 01:57, Joacim Persson wrote: > I've discovered a difference between how fgfs calls the yasim solver, and > how the "yasim" binary (aka yasim-test) does it. I have a -yasim.xml which > doesn't pass yasim(-test) but which fgfs accepts... ?:-P > > So what is the difference?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] yasim(-test) vs fgfs

2005-12-03 Thread Andy Ross
Joacim Persson wrote: > I've discovered a difference between how fgfs calls the yasim solver, and > how the "yasim" binary (aka yasim-test) does it. I have a -yasim.xml which > doesn't pass yasim(-test) but which fgfs accepts... ?:-P > > So what is the difference? Number of iterations? That sounds

Re: [Flightgear-devel] yasim(-test) vs fgfs

2005-12-03 Thread Joacim Persson
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Andy Ross wrote: That sounds like a bug. They are intended to produce identical behavior. Is it possible you have a yasim binary build from a different version of the code than your fgfs? My first thought too. The file I used was the AN-225-yasim.xml with the only modifi