RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs]CVS:data/Aircraft/Lockheed1049/Models

2005-11-28 Thread Jon Berndt
> That was my understanding of it, but it seemed to not work with ___'s > Connie model. Upon further review it looks like ___'s Connie model has > an x-offset of about 14 meters, and I can't figure out why. So, I'll drop my > investigation of it. > > Dave :-) Once we get the new JSBSim

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:data/Aircraft/Lockheed1049/Models

2005-11-28 Thread Dave Culp
On Sunday 27 November 2005 08:56 pm, Jon Berndt wrote: > No. The VRP defines the location of an agreed-upon reference point in > structural coordinates. The CG, eyepoint, gear locations, etc. are all > defined (in JSBSim) in structural frame. > ... That was my understanding of it, but it seemed t

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:data/Aircraft/Lockheed1049/Models

2005-11-27 Thread Jon Berndt
> One thing that may be confusing is that the VRP setting given by aeromatic is > wrong. In the JSBSim configuration file If the CG location is X, Y, Z, > then the VRP location is -X, -Y, -Z.I had thought that AC_VRP defines the > location of the VRP, however it actually defines the location