> Alex Romosan wrote:
>
> >that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear
> would involve a
> >full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries. and
> >compiling flightgear does take a very long time. now, if you use
> >dynamic libraries, you can make your change in simgear
Sorry, I normally wouldn't send corrections on my message but I made
some lazy typos that make my message more confusing than it should have
been. Let me try again ...
Using static or dynamic libs really doesn't make that much difference
when recompiling FlightGear. It is your "installation p
Am Sonntag 08 Mai 2005 19:33 schrieb Martin Spott:
> Alex Romosan wrote:
> > that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear would involve a
> > full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries.
>
> Well, if you do substantial changes to SimGear that affects the
> headers, the
Alex Romosan wrote:
that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear would involve a
full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries. and
compiling flightgear does take a very long time. now, if you use
dynamic libraries, you can make your change in simgear and just go fly
rig
Alex Romosan wrote:
> that was exactly the original problem: changes in simgear would involve a
> full recompilation of flightgear if you use static libraries.
Well, if you do substantial changes to SimGear that affects the
headers, then you have to recompile the relating parts of FlightGear
anyw
Am Sonntag 08 Mai 2005 04:26 schrieben Sie:
> Am Sonntag 08 Mai 2005 03:22 schrieb Alex Romosan:
> > Karsten Krispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > just a small question: is it hard to include simgear as shared libs?
> > > When you want to change something in simgear you have to recompile
> > >
