I might even be able to write a script to do that move.
> With a moderate amount of work, we can move all of those models to
> JSBSim. They won't be fully accurate, but they'll still be better
> than the UIUC versions.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailin
John Check writes:
> I'm curious, is the UIUC stuff destined for the bit bucket, you
> think? I don't recall ever seing anything new. Andy has been
> cranking out YASim planes at a pretty good pace. Not that I have a
> problem with Aircraft-uiuc, and it's definitely been a good source
> of
On Thursday 06 December 2001 1:35 pm, you wrote:
> David Megginson wrote:
> > Since we have the YASim FDM in the FlightGear source tree, it makes
> > sense to add Andy's four config files to the base package. Right
> > now, YASim looks for the config files in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft; that's
> > pro
On Thursday 06 December 2001 1:26 pm, you wrote:
> Since we have the YASim FDM in the FlightGear source tree, it makes
> sense to add Andy's four config files to the base package. Right now,
> YASim looks for the config files in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft; that's probably
> going to be a bit confusing, si
Curtis L. Olson writes:
> Ok, I have created $FG_ROOT/Aircraft-yasim and added the yasim xml
> files there. I will also do the corresponding code change.
I remove X15set.xml, since it wasn't from YASim (you must have copied
it from Aircraft/ accidentally).
All the best,
David
--
David M
David Megginson wrote:
> Since we have the YASim FDM in the FlightGear source tree, it makes
> sense to add Andy's four config files to the base package. Right
> now, YASim looks for the config files in $FG_ROOT/Aircraft; that's
> probably going to be a bit confusing, since the JSBSim models
