> Alistair K Phipps writes:
> >
> > or use vector< FGTable* > rather than vector< FGTable >,
>
> Yes I prefer using this form too
>
> Norman
I made a few small changes to use the pointer as described above by Alistair.
That took
care of the problem. Thanks guys.
Jon
___
Alistair K Phipps writes:
>
> or use vector< FGTable* > rather than vector< FGTable >,
Yes I prefer using this form too
Cheers
Norman
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f
Jon Berndt writes:
>
> > Can you give a complete minimal example? I just tried the
> > following one, and this compiles without problems, as it should:
>
> See below.
>
> > Are you *using* the assignment operator for your class
> > somewhere?
>
> Not that I know of.
see below
> FGTable::FG
Jon Berndt wrote:
Are you *using* the assignment operator for your class
somewhere?
Not that I know of.
FGTable::FGTable(const FGTable& t) :
PropertyManager(t.PropertyManager)
{
Tables = t.Tables;
I think the problem is this assignment of vector< FGTable > which
involves assignmen
> But I don't know at the moment, why Jons code doesn't work :(
>
> CU,
> Christian
For the moment, I'll just make it non-const.
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f58
> Can you give a complete minimal example? I just tried the
> following one, and this compiles without problems, as it should:
See below.
> Are you *using* the assignment operator for your class
> somewhere?
Not that I know of.
> Cheers
> -Gerhard
Header file for FGTable:
--- start ---
#inc
> I think it complains the class has no constructor other than the
> copy one.
>
> you should try to add one :
>
> class MyClass {
> public:
> MyClass(AnotherClass *p); // constructor
> MyClass(const MyClass &mc); // copy constructor
>
> private:
> AnotherClass* const ptrToAnotherClass;
Mathias Fröhlich schrieb:
On Freitag 10 Dezember 2004 03:40, Jon Berndt wrote:
This gives me an odd error:
non-static const member `AnotherClass* const ptrToAnotherClass', can't use
default assignment operator
If I remove the const specifier from the declaration for ptrToAnotherClass,
and then mov
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
That is something which is, I believe, missinterpreted by some compilers.
You have a constant value and as such it cannot change. Initial assignment is
a change and so you cannot assign that one.
Your compiler seems to allow such an assignment for static members, but not
f
Hmm...
Can you give a complete minimal example? I just tried the following
one, and this compiles without problems, as it should:
=< snip >==
struct bar {} ;
struct foo {
foo( foo const& rhs ) : p( rhs.p ) {}
bar* const p ;
On Freitag 10 Dezember 2004 03:40, Jon Berndt wrote:
> This gives me an odd error:
>
> non-static const member `AnotherClass* const ptrToAnotherClass', can't use
> default assignment operator
>
> If I remove the const specifier from the declaration for ptrToAnotherClass,
> and then move the assign
Jon Berndt wrote:
> I have a situation where I am getting an error and I am not sure why. I have
> a class
> MyClass that has a copy constructor. The class has a private member that is a
> const
> pointer (the pointer is constant - not what the pointer points to):
>
> class MyClass {
> public:
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
