Selon Martin Spott:
> Josh Babcock wrote:
>
> > Would it be feasible instead to have an entry in the new object's xml
> > file listing some exact coordinates at which any existing objects should
> > be removed from the scene-graph? That would be transparent to the user
> [...]
>
> but this so
Josh Babcock wrote:
> Would it be feasible instead to have an entry in the new object's xml
> file listing some exact coordinates at which any existing objects should
> be removed from the scene-graph? That would be transparent to the user
[...]
but this solution implements a really dirty ha
Hi there,
I am fairly new to flightgear and there are two subjects I would like to get
involved into.
I am a 3D modeller for Strike Fighters : Project 1 (check out
http://www.column5.us, there is a F/A-18 model I made) using blender.
I am willing to build many models for FlightGear but I can s
"Ampere K. Hardraade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On January 16, 2006 01:39 pm, Alex Romosan wrote:
>> i compile it on amd64; debian version 4.0.3 20060104 (prerelease).
>> stand alone JSBSim compiles fine as well. what exactly is the error you
>> are getting?
>>
>> --alex--
>
> Do you mean gcc
OK, so I have this nice static radio tower model in Jon's DB, but it
replaces a shared object (two actually, since there are two antennas on
the tower, and therefore two entries).
Now, how do I tell whoever is installing this stuff which objects to
remove? Assuming that the exact locations and alt
On January 16, 2006 01:39 pm, Alex Romosan wrote:
> i compile it on amd64; debian version 4.0.3 20060104 (prerelease).
> stand alone JSBSim compiles fine as well. what exactly is the error you
> are getting?
>
> --alex--
Do you mean gcc 4.0.3?
Ampere
I've packaged up the latest JSBSim code into 0.9.10 (Pre-v1.0). It is
available in the Files section of www.sf.net/projects/jsbsim.
There are executables built for several versions of Linux: i386, PPC, AMD64.
There is a Win32 executable. Simplot is available there for Win32. The
source archive is
I'd be happy to submit the config, however, getting the config (I don't
think) is my problem.
I have an xml file that worked in 0.9.8. My problem is getting 0.9.9 to
load the combatstick.xml file (apparently).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> CH PRO PEDALS USB
> CH COMBATSTICK USB
IIRC only the first has a pre-defined config in the fg cvs.
I suggest you clone the CH yoke config file, and modify it
accordingly. Or, just do a fresh start with "fgjs" and start
with the js1.xml file it generates for your combatstick.
When you have a good
Actually, this does not seem to be working correctly.
I have two products connected:
CH PRO PEDALS USB
CH COMBATSTICK USB
In my joystick config xml file I have (inside the PropertyList tag)
CH PRODUCTS CH COMBATSTICK USB
CH COMBATSTICK USB
The system seems to recognize the pedals, but not
> "Jon S. Berndt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Has anyone tried compiling the newest CVS FlightGear with a 64 bit
> > machine? I can't get JSBSim to compile under a 64 bit OS (the
> > Sourceforge compile farm Alpha).
>
> i compile it on amd64; debian version 4.0.3 20060104 (prerelease).
> stan
"Jon S. Berndt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone tried compiling the newest CVS FlightGear with a 64 bit
> machine? I can't get JSBSim to compile under a 64 bit OS (the
> Sourceforge compile farm Alpha).
i compile it on amd64; debian version 4.0.3 20060104 (prerelease).
stand alone JSBSim
Has anyone tried compiling the newest CVS FlightGear with a 64 bit machine?
I can't get JSBSim to compile under a 64 bit OS (the Sourceforge compile
farm Alpha).
Jon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fi
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik
Hofman
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:26 AM
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Joystick Configuration
Todd L. Peters wrote:
> I had my joystick worki
Stefan Seifert wrote:
> Josh Babcock wrote:
>
>> I don't have a problem with fg putting stuff into my preferences.xml,
>> that is a pretty common practice with configuration software. The
>> problem is the stuff it took out.
>>
>> And to add insult to injury, the idea of persistent configuration
>
Josh Babcock wrote:
I don't have a problem with fg putting stuff into my preferences.xml,
that is a pretty common practice with configuration software. The
problem is the stuff it took out.
And to add insult to injury, the idea of persistent configuration
changes is good, but it looks like I can
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:40:41PM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
>
>>We also should also think about picking a file name that more clearly
>>indicates that this is something reserved for the FlightGear app to use,
>>not for user customizations.
>
>
> I had suggested ~/.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:40:41PM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> We also should also think about picking a file name that more clearly
> indicates that this is something reserved for the FlightGear app to use,
> not for user customizations.
I had suggested ~/.fgfs/autosave.xml ... several time
Todd L. Peters wrote:
I had my joystick working in 0.9.8 and upgraded to 0.9.9, and am having a
bit of trouble figuring out how things work.
I can make a joystick configuration file for my joystick, no problem. How
do I get Flightgear to reference it?
I thought, in 0.9.8, that there was a joys
19 matches
Mail list logo
