> > I think we should merge the latest JSBSim code into fg before
> releasing
> > 0.9.11. There are many fixes since the last merge and I'd love to
> have them
> > in fg, too.
> >
> > Torsten
> >
> >
> Me, Too, I'd love to have them:)
>
> --
> Gérard
> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
I'd
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:52:36 -0800
Syd&Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:53:47 +0100
> Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Syd&Sandy -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> > > And by not defining a view i meant the default FGFS , no extra
> > > views added beyond FLY
On mar 27 novembre 2007, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should merge the latest JSBSim code into fg before releasing
> 0.9.11. There are many fixes since the last merge and I'd love to have them
> in fg, too.
>
> Torsten
>
>
>
Me, Too, I'd love to have them:)
--
Gérard
http://p
--- Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I now have a working chat menu system, which will generate canned chat
> messages by using a simple menu system, access by the numbers on your
> keyboard. The canned messages are somewhat dynamic, in that they pick up
> the current airport, and your own callsign and al
Hi,
I think we should merge the latest JSBSim code into fg before releasing
0.9.11. There are many fixes since the last merge and I'd love to have them
in fg, too.
Torsten
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
D
> So it's only missing #include which should
> be in the code. See the attachments.
>
> [...]
>
> #include
> +#include
> +#include
Surely that should be , no? It's just a style thing, but if
you're modifying code that is already using ANSI C headers, and not
Standard C++ headers, you should s
> These two files are nolonger used by the SenecaII as it now uses the
> files from
> Instruments-3d/Century-III/ ;
> Right Torsten?
Correct - Melchior removed them (thanks).
I will fix the remaining SenecaII animations at the end of this week.
Torsten
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:53:47 +0100
Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Syd&Sandy -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> > And by not defining a view i meant the default FGFS , no extra
> > views added beyond FLY-BY :)...
>
> Then there will be no extra views, not even "a strange sea-level
> vi
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 15:22, Ladislav Michnovič wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have yet another two patches to get FlightGear and Simgear
> compiling with new gcc 4.3, which is stricter about missing
> declarations of functions. So it's only missing #include which should
> be in the code. See the attach
On Monday 26 November 2007 19:52, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Please apply this patch if you still have time before the official
> 0.9.11-pre2 release.
> Otherwise, apply this on the next release.
>
Okay, done.
Cheers,
Durk
---
On Monday 26 November 2007 03:09, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
>
> Durk, (and more developers), could you test this patch so it can run
> on linux and windows properly?
> If so, please apply this patch. Otherwise, I'm gonna make a new patch
> with #ifdef __APPLE__ #endif closure
> not to affect other
* Syd&Sandy -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> And by not defining a view i meant the default FGFS , no extra
> views added beyond FLY-BY :)...
Then there will be no extra views, not even "a strange sea-level
view with two lines running toward and meeting at the horizon".
Could it be that you have an
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:32:19 +0100
Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> > * Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> > > You can also set /sim/current-view/view-number=-101.
> >
> > Better don't do that. I have no idea if all listeners
Hi.
I have yet another two patches to get FlightGear and Simgear
compiling with new gcc 4.3, which is stricter about missing
declarations of functions. So it's only missing #include which should
be in the code. See the attachments.
Btw. I'm building the RPMs for Fedora, Mandriva and SuSE in Buil
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> * Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> > You can also set /sim/current-view/view-number=-101.
>
> Better don't do that. I have no idea if all listeners on that
> property can digest a -101.
BS. That's not a problem. The negative number ne
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 27 November 2007:
> You can also set /sim/current-view/view-number=-101.
Better don't do that. I have no idea if all listeners on that
property can digest a -101. view.indexof("View Name") is better,
anyway, as using hardcoded numbers is always problematic.
m.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
