On 01/23/2008 05:45 PM, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> Can any of you aero experts out there identify the coefficients that
> account for wing dihedral?
Isn't this what you want?
Roll_moment_due_to_beta
If not, please ask a more specific question.
--
Csaba Halász schrieb:
> On Jan 24, 2008 12:45 AM, Georg Vollnhals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> since some short time I am getting an error when compiling FlightGear
>> CVS/OSG version.
>>
>> I am using
>> - OpenSuse 10.2 Linux
>> - OSG CVS (compiles with no problem)
>>
>
> I hope
Hi,
Looking over a couple of xml aircraft files and aero numbers...
Can any of you aero experts out there identify the coefficients that
account for wing dihedral? I can't seem to find anything that would
account for the difference in wing lift on left side versus right side
thereby creating t
Csaba Halász schrieb:
> On Jan 24, 2008 12:45 AM, Georg Vollnhals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> since some short time I am getting an error when compiling FlightGear
>> CVS/OSG version.
>>
>> I am using
>> - OpenSuse 10.2 Linux
>> - OSG CVS (compiles with no problem)
>>
>
> I hope
On Jan 24, 2008 12:45 AM, Georg Vollnhals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> since some short time I am getting an error when compiling FlightGear
> CVS/OSG version.
>
> I am using
> - OpenSuse 10.2 Linux
> - OSG CVS (compiles with no problem)
I hope you mean SVN ;) Which revision?
> collect2: ld
>
> This will be a challenge for us as we move forward with development of the
> OSG tree. How much old hardware should we support, and how far back should
> we go?
>
> I think it makes sense (at a minimum) to make sure these features that
> require newer hardware can be turned off so tha
Hi,
since some short time I am getting an error when compiling FlightGear
CVS/OSG version.
I am using
- OpenSuse 10.2 Linux
- OSG CVS (compiles with no problem)
- SimGear CVS (compiles with no problem)
- FG CVS
Part of the error code:
../../src/Instrumentation/libInstrumentation.a(wxradar.o): In
On Jan 23, 2008 3:13 PM, Matthias Boerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't think a driver update will help because your card has
> only "limited" support for vertex and pixel shaders as you already
> stated in your mail.
>
> On Wikipedia is a nice summary of the Nvidia GeForce4 MX:
>
> http://
Hallo Morten,
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 20:13:01 Morten Oesterlund Joergensen
wrote:
>
> I get a lot of "FRAGMENT glCompileShader "" FAILED" error messages
> and no trees.
> I made a search on Google and it seems that my graphics card does not
> support some extensions. It is a NVIDIA GeForce
On Jan 23, 2008 2:51 PM, Curtis Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> I've committed these changes. Looks like some of the files you request to
> be removed are newly introduced with this patch, but other than that slight
> oddity, it looks like your changes went in clean.
And ooops,
>
> I just posted another update:
>
> http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/~jrbabcock/flightgear/ch53e/ch53e-rollup.20080123.tgz<http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/%7Ejrbabcock/flightgear/ch53e/ch53e-rollup.20080123.tgz>
>
> I also need some files removed, they accidentally sneake
I just posted another update:
http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/~jrbabcock/flightgear/ch53e/ch53e-rollup.20080123.tgz
I also need some files removed, they accidentally sneaked
in on the last update:
Models/HMMWV.ac
Models/ch53e.fail
Models/ch53e.fail.ac
Models/ch53e.succ.ac
Models/doit
Models
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 22:04 +, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I've been working on a shader-based approach to creating random trees with
> help
> from Tim Moore.
>
> Here's a screenshot of what I've managed to achieve so far:
>
> http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/forest.jpg
>
> A patch which in
> That sounds like you're using TCP, since if you were using UDP, the
> master would not know if the slave(s) received the message -- UDP is an
> unreliable protocol and the master
> does not know if it is transmittiing into oblivion or reaching an actual
> slave instance of FlightGear. Provided th
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'll have a look in the next few days. I just came back from my Japan trip a
> few days ago, and I'm still trying to shake off the last remaining bits of
> jetlag.
>
> Btw, I had an amazing trip. I'll try to post some s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
| --- Curtis Olson wrote:
|> Hi Guys,
|>
|> Again, I love and very much appreciate your efforts on the trees. They are
|> really awsome.
|
| Low level flying through the hills has become much more fun...
|
|> On the subject of d
On Jan 23, 2008 10:10 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> --- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > I've been accused in private mail of poisoning the list
> > climate with messages like these. I'm a bit puzzled.
> > For me OMG is not a prayer, and WTF is not swearing.
> > And PSL *was* a joke compared with Nasal, n
> > Currently I cannot reproduce any other misbehaviour than the segfault
> > that you describe as gone now.
>
> Do you have .deb based system? If so, I could send you the relevant deb
> packages we used. Or alternatively we could try reproducing the issue on
> vservers and send you a compressed vs
--- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> I've been accused in private mail of poisoning the list
> climate with messages like these. I'm a bit puzzled.
> For me OMG is not a prayer, and WTF is not swearing.
> And PSL *was* a joke compared with Nasal, not because
> it was done badly. It just never grew up and co
* Curtis Olson -- Saturday 22 December 2007:
> when I get back maybe send me a reminder.
Just for the record: this has meanwhile been done. But as
things stand now, I don't think it will have an effect.
m.
-
This SF.net emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
| I've been accused in private mail of poisoning the list
| climate with messages like these. I'm a bit puzzled.
| For me OMG is not a prayer, and WTF is not swearing.
| And PSL *was* a joke compared with Nasal, not because
| it w
I've been accused in private mail of poisoning the list
climate with messages like these. I'm a bit puzzled.
For me OMG is not a prayer, and WTF is not swearing.
And PSL *was* a joke compared with Nasal, not because
it was done badly. It just never grew up and couldn't
do a fraction of what Nasal c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maik Justus wrote:
| Hi Stuart,
|
| Stuart Buchanan schrieb am 22.01.2008 23:04:
|> Hi All,
|>
|> I've been working on a shader-based approach to creating random trees with
help
|> from Tim Moore.
|>
|> Here's a screenshot of what I've managed to achi
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:04:07 +0100
Maik Justus wrote:
>
> What comes next? Shader driven swarms of birds, flocks, clouds? ;-)
Clouds clouds clouds clouds clouds!
Last night, I was daydreaming of these trees and the Fire Service OV-10
we have, thinking of how cool a forest fire scenario would be.
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Buchanan schrieb am 22.01.2008 23:04:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been working on a shader-based approach to creating random trees with
> help
> from Tim Moore.
>
> Here's a screenshot of what I've managed to achieve so far:
>
> http://www.nanjika.co.uk/flightgear/forest.jpg
>
> A patch
Never mind ...
$ grep PSL NEWS
* Removed support for the PSL scripting language.
It *is* already removed. Or rather supposed to be. Just
not completely. I'll remove the remains.
m.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: M
WTF is PSL, you ask? It's our other scripting language,
besides Nasal (PSL ... "plib's scripting language"). But
it was only ever used once in CVS (for a keybinding that
output lat/lon IIRC), we'll sooner or later abandon plib
altogether, and PSL is a joke compared with Nasal.
Objections? Any user
Am Mittwoch 23 Januar 2008 schrieb Heiko Schulz:
> > Oops , now I see a lot of ...
> >
> > Warning:detected OpenGL error 'invalid operation'
> > after RenderBin::draw(,) in the teminal
> > but otherwise it seems to go smoothly ...
> > Cheers
> >
> > --
>
> This message I got the last months wi
On Tuesday 22 January 2008, Andy Ross wrote:
> till busch wrote:
> > * f_interpolate in NasalSys was leaky (valgrind)
>
> This leak is real, but the patch isn't legal C++, at least as of the
> last time I read the standard. You can't initialize a stack array
> with a dynamic value, it has to b
--- Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 9:36 PM, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> > Just gave the patch a try , amazing ! And this time it has hardly any
> > effect on my framerate ...
> > Cheers
>
> It would be very tempting to commit it to cvs ...
>
> Curt.
I have no objection to it going into CVS.
I ha
--- Syd&Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:45:32 -0600
> "Curtis Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 22, 2008 9:36 PM, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> >
> > > Just gave the patch a try , amazing ! And this
> time it has hardly any
> > > effect on my framerate ...
> > > Ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave perry wrote:
| dave perry wrote:
|> Tim Moore wrote:
|>
|>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|>> Hash: SHA1
|>>
|>> dave perry wrote:
|>> | Patch adds a member function to FGRenderer class that returns the
|>> | current aspect ratio. Uses this
32 matches
Mail list logo
