On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Alexis Bory - xiii
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We now have to add a to the part. I fear a lot
> of aircrafts may be impacted by this, though it's not a bigdeal to add
> some ugly thing like this:
>
> utilities/numeral-1
>
> I'm really sorry, I can't say p
Heiko Schulz schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I couldn't longer resist, so I did a new exterior model of our default
> aircraft. The exterior model should be now really accurate and up-to-date, it
> has livery-select over mp, Immatriculation over MP, pre-rendered
> softshadow
>
> Unfortunately I have no t
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:58:19 +0200, Stefan wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tuesday, 16. September 2008, Saurabh Gupta wrote:
> > this is
> > ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500]
>
> That's six generations and seven years behind current graphics
> hardware
Geoff
>
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 18:10 +0100, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > Geoff wrote
> >
> > >
> > > As a followup to my previous post - I just tried single stepping from
> > > main(). I am getting into the first try and the degugger is stuck at
> > > atexit(fgExitCleanup). An error pops up "The
Hi,
I couldn't longer resist, so I did a new exterior model of our default
aircraft. The exterior model should be now really accurate and up-to-date, it
has livery-select over mp, Immatriculation over MP, pre-rendered softshadow
Unfortunately I have no time for the interior, and the liverie
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:32:50 -0700 (PDT), Saurabh wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> First of all thanks for the response.
>
>
> --- On Mon, 9/15/08, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc versi
Hi,
I noticed that since a few days or weeks the animations like the
following are broken:
object
material
1.0
1.0
1.0
We now have to add a to the part. I fear a lot
of aircrafts may be impacted by this, though it's not a bigdeal to add
some ugly th
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 18:10 +0100, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Geoff wrote
>
> >
> > As a followup to my previous post - I just tried single stepping from
> > main(). I am getting into the first try and the degugger is stuck at
> > atexit(fgExitCleanup). An error pops up "The sysbol 'atexit' is not
On Tuesday, 16. September 2008, Saurabh Gupta wrote:
> this is
> ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500]
That's six generations and seven years behind current graphics hardware. I
don't know too much about FG's requirements, but I'd bet that this card just
doesn't matc
Geoff wrote
>
> As a followup to my previous post - I just tried single stepping from
> main(). I am getting into the first try and the degugger is stuck at
> atexit(fgExitCleanup). An error pops up "The sysbol 'atexit' is not
> defined". The debugger will not let me signle step into or over i
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Geoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a followup to my previous post - I just tried single stepping from
> main(). I am getting into the first try and the degugger is stuck at
> atexit(fgExitCleanup). An error pops up "The sysbol 'atexit' is not
> defined". The d
As a followup to my previous post - I just tried single stepping from
main(). I am getting into the first try and the degugger is stuck at
atexit(fgExitCleanup). An error pops up "The sysbol 'atexit' is not
defined". The debugger will not let me signle step into or over it.
--
Geoff McLean
McLe
First of all thanks for the response.
--- On Mon, 9/15/08, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] is linux ppc version non-functional?
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Monday, September 15, 2008, 7:52
The continuing saga of a noobie trying to install/compile/run FG in
windoze.
I've gotten everything to compile and link - theoretically. Well, there
is an fgfs.exe created. I've spent a couple of days gathering tools,
etc to try and troubleshoot this thing, but still no joy.
If I run fgfs from
Tim Moore wrote:
> You're seeing it in the pa24-250. The depth sort can go awry with
> nearly-coplanar polygons. Furthermore, it's too expensive to sort every
> polygon,
> so the sort is based on sets of polygons which just make the sorting
> ambiguity
> worse. The plib version doesn't sort a
James Turner wrote:
> On 16 Sep 2008, at 07:05, Erik Hofman wrote:
>
>>> ALPHA_TEST is slow on modern hardware, which is why I was hoping to
>>> not have it
>>> be on by default in the scene graph. Oh well. I'll leave this
>>> reverted for now
>>> and think about turning it on only for states
16 matches
Mail list logo
