Re: [Flightgear-devel] [IMPORTANT] questionable extension to the property system planned: compound property types

2009-03-22 Thread Tim Moore
Frederic Bouvier wrote: > Erik Hofman a écrit : >> Frederic Bouvier wrote: >> >>> Tim, perhaps if you could show us a real effect file, with the syntax >>> you propose, we ( at least I ) could see what we are talking about, and >>> the pros and cons of the new syntax. >>> That's a great ide

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build with -Werror=format-security

2009-03-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Frederik -- Sunday 22 March 2009: > Could you verify if this patch is correct, It isn't. It's double wrong. It changes from *using* a format to *displaying* it. And it introduces "%d" for a char*. m. -- Apps built wit

[Flightgear-devel] Build with -Werror=format-security

2009-03-22 Thread Frederik
Mandriva uses the CFLAG -Werror=format-security by default now. To build flightgear 1.9.1 with this CFLAG, I had to apply this patch. http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/flightgear/current/SOURCES/FlightGear-1.9.1-string-fmt.patch?view=co Could you verify if this patch is c

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Instrumentation agradar.cxx, 1.3, 1.4 rad_alt.cxx, 1.2, 1.3 wxradar.cxx, 1.28, 1.29 wxradar.hxx, 1.20, 1.21

2009-03-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Durk Talsma -- Sunday 22 March 2009: > On Sunday 22 March 2009 15:58:27 Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > One idea would be to put it by where the callsign is now, and only > > if it's not available use the callsign. > > Sound good. Just let me know If there's anything that I need to change. OK, I'll h

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Instrumentation agradar.cxx, 1.3, 1.4 rad_alt.cxx, 1.2, 1.3 wxradar.cxx, 1.28, 1.29 wxradar.hxx, 1.20, 1.21

2009-03-22 Thread Alexis Bory - xiii
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Durk Talsma -- Sunday 22 March 2009: > > FWIW, I just checked in a small change that allows the AI Air > > Traffic controller to request the AI Aircraft to set a squawk code. > > > > Yeah, I've read that, and we've immediately discussed on IRC how to > use that. Unfortu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Instrumentation agradar.cxx, 1.3, 1.4 rad_alt.cxx, 1.2, 1.3 wxradar.cxx, 1.28, 1.29 wxradar.hxx, 1.20, 1.21

2009-03-22 Thread Durk Talsma
On Sunday 22 March 2009 15:58:27 Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Durk Talsma -- Sunday 22 March 2009: > > FWIW, I just checked in a small change that allows the AI Air Traffic > > controller to request the AI Aircraft to set a squawk code. > > Yeah, I've read that, and we've immediately discussed on IRC

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Instrumentation agradar.cxx, 1.3, 1.4 rad_alt.cxx, 1.2, 1.3 wxradar.cxx, 1.28, 1.29 wxradar.hxx, 1.20, 1.21

2009-03-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Durk Talsma -- Sunday 22 March 2009: > FWIW, I just checked in a small change that allows the AI Air Traffic > controller to request the AI Aircraft to set a squawk code. Yeah, I've read that, and we've immediately discussed on IRC how to use that. Unfortunately, we didn't have an ATC/Radar scr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Instrumentation agradar.cxx, 1.3, 1.4 rad_alt.cxx, 1.2, 1.3 wxradar.cxx, 1.28, 1.29 wxradar.hxx, 1.20, 1.21

2009-03-22 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi, On Tuesday 17 March 2009 23:01:38 Melchior Franz wrote: > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Instrumentation > In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17937/src/Instrumentation > > Modified Files: > agradar.cxx rad_alt.cxx wxradar.cxx wxradar.hxx > Log Message: > wxradar

[Flightgear-devel] Carrier landing and groundcache with JSBSim Aircrafts

2009-03-22 Thread gerard robin
Hello, Mathias With JSBsim aircraft i get now some strange behaviour regarding the groundcache on a moving Carrier. We can start from catapult on carrier, and the Aircraft is sitting correctly in place on the Ship , it follows correctly the speed of the carrier. => No problem :) After bein

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [IMPORTANT] questionable extension to the property system planned: compound property types

2009-03-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Frederic Bouvier -- Sunday 22 March 2009: > >> > >> .4 .5 .7 1.0 > >> > Is it the whole file ? Are we talking about ten lines or tons of them ? Not even tons of that would justify breaking the internal property representation. If lines are *really* an issue, then do this:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [IMPORTANT] questionable extension to the property system planned: compound property types

2009-03-22 Thread Erik Hofman
Frederic Bouvier wrote: > Is it the whole file ? Are we talking about ten lines or tons of them ? This was just one example. Erik -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [IMPORTANT] questionable extension to the property system planned: compound property types

2009-03-22 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Erik Hofman a écrit : > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > >> Tim, perhaps if you could show us a real effect file, with the syntax >> you propose, we ( at least I ) could see what we are talking about, and >> the pros and cons of the new syntax. >> > > That was in the original proposal (RFC): > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [IMPORTANT] questionable extension to the property system planned: compound property types

2009-03-22 Thread Erik Hofman
Frederic Bouvier wrote: > Tim, perhaps if you could show us a real effect file, with the syntax > you propose, we ( at least I ) could see what we are talking about, and > the pros and cons of the new syntax. That was in the original proposal (RFC): > Proposal: Allow vector types as properties in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [IMPORTANT] questionable extension to the property system planned: compound property types

2009-03-22 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Erik Hofman a écrit : > Tim Moore wrote: > >> Perhaps. I'm not proposing to change the syntax you like. I just want to >> evolve the very useful property system to support the syntax I like. >> > > So far nobody seems to like the idea of abandoning > for a list of numbers. I think you can

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [IMPORTANT] questionable extension to the property system planned: compound property types

2009-03-22 Thread Erik Hofman
Tim Moore wrote: > Perhaps. I'm not proposing to change the syntax you like. I just want to > evolve the very useful property system to support the syntax I like. So far nobody seems to like the idea of abandoning for a list of numbers. I think you can safely forget about that. To be honest I

[Flightgear-devel] Please add Matekane Air strip, Matekane.dat included

2009-03-22 Thread FlightGear
Hi, I submitted Matekane Air strip to Robin Peels database today. But It takes a while for Robin to get and process email and much longer to get apt in fgfs updated from master. So I was hoping to get it in fgfs quicker by going this route as well. I have attached a text file Matekane.dat. H