Re: [Flightgear-devel] pthread error compiling simgear under ubuntu 11.10 (beta2)

2011-09-27 Thread Francesco Angelo Brisa
success ! using cmake ended in a successful compilation :-D ok, now I will cmake fgfs too and send the new script to Thorsten. Thaank you ! -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains

Re: [Flightgear-devel] pthread error compiling simgear under ubuntu 11.10 (beta2)

2011-09-27 Thread James Turner
On 27 Sep 2011, at 09:00, Francesco Angelo Brisa wrote: ok, now I will cmake fgfs too and send the new script to Thorsten. Thaank you ! That's good news indeed! James -- All the data continuously generated in

[Flightgear-devel] git

2011-09-27 Thread Michael Sgier
HiI've messed up weather in fgdata. How could i discard local changes and only get changes/original files? Git says to be up to date but weather is broken.Later I'll do my first upload. (groundnetworks.xml etc.) I do alike the wiki and after commit simply do a git push?Thanks Michael

[Flightgear-devel] Atmospheric haze modelling

2011-09-27 Thread thorsten . i . renk
I've spent some time over the last days to add a model for an optically thick regime to the skydome scattering shader. I am rather happy with the model (as far as the skydome is concerned, it now renders visibilities down to 1000 m in a plausible way, the transition to the optically thin regime

Re: [Flightgear-devel] git

2011-09-27 Thread Curtis Olson
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Michael Sgier wrote: Hi I've messed up weather in fgdata. How could i discard local changes and only get changes/original files? Git says to be up to date but weather is broken. Later I'll do my first upload. (groundnetworks.xml etc.) I do alike the wiki

Re: [Flightgear-devel] git

2011-09-27 Thread TDO_Brandano -
if you just want to discard EVERYTHING back to the head version (make sure you are on the master branch) try this: git checkout -- . the full stop is part of the command, btw Alessandro. From: curtol...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:25:56 -0500 To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Any alpha testers with a bit of extra time on their hands?

2011-09-27 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:04:02 -0500, Curtis wrote in message CAHtsj_fM87grwpzG-vYmANWnALfojsGhOA=dWGajb4gSj2=w...@mail.gmail.com: Updated to Beta02 -- with hopefully a bit better view management and some more small gain tweaks (probably nothing anyone will notice.) ..tried to set camera target

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Any alpha testers with a bit of extra time on their hands?

2011-09-27 Thread Curtis Olson
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote: ..tried to set camera target to some place on-shore with the camera operator click-to-point-to-orbit, on climb-out this is over-ridden to Carrier, Hi Arnt, There is some logic going on there to try to automatically guess what

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Any alpha testers with a bit of extra time on their hands?

2011-09-27 Thread Ron Jensen
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 15:53:26 Curtis Olson wrote: a heavier than air balloon ... Would that be a Led Zeppelin? :) Ron -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Any alpha testers with a bit of extra time on their hands?

2011-09-27 Thread Curtis Olson
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Ron Jensen wrote: On Tuesday 27 September 2011 15:53:26 Curtis Olson wrote: a heavier than air balloon ... Would that be a Led Zeppelin? That's more clever than what I was thinking. :-) Open-humor. Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://www.atiak.com -