Re: [Flightgear-devel] New package of 2.6.0 for Mac

2012-02-22 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi Tat, Thanks for you build! Both carbon and cocoa seems to work fine on my MBP with lion. I took me a few hours to download, so I had not much time to test. Resizing Windows with cocoa: no problem. I only realized now that the patchy, flashing aircraft is to be seen with the c172p and not t

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery related: groundnetworks and parking

2012-02-22 Thread Martin Spott
Christian Schmitt wrote: > Martin Spott wrote: > >> Any volunteer(s) ? Proper representation of ground network nodes as >> PostGIS (actually OGC) geometry data type preferred. >> > > Apparently you don't want any 850 centerlines as a base for this, which > would be easy as gdal imports 850 dat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery related: groundnetworks and parking

2012-02-22 Thread Christian Schmitt
Martin Spott wrote: > Any volunteer(s) ? Proper representation of ground network nodes as > PostGIS (actually OGC) geometry data type preferred. > Apparently you don't want any 850 centerlines as a base for this, which would be easy as gdal imports 850 data directly into Postgis, as you surely

[Flightgear-devel] New package of 2.6.0 for Mac

2012-02-22 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Dear Mac users, Thanks to your help, I made a new package that solves many problems that are reported so far. I recommend all mac/fg users apply the new package - for speed and stability. Please go visit the site below for detail explanation and download: http://macflightgear.sourceforge.net/fli

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the

2012-02-22 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Okay, not just the right time and place, but also the right combination of high quality stuff :-) It's indeed London Gatwick. -- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the

2012-02-22 Thread Durk Talsma
On 22 Feb 2012, at 19:32, Martin Spott wrote: > Gijs de Rooy wrote: > >>> Gijs' Air Bucharest shot >> >> All kuddos for that one go to Brett Harrison (livery), Heiko Schulz >> (aircraft) and Don Lavelle (airport). > > We don't have this on Scenemodels. Do we ? At least I can't see any > Buch

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the

2012-02-22 Thread Martin Spott
Gijs de Rooy wrote: >> Gijs' Air Bucharest shot > > All kuddos for that one go to Brett Harrison (livery), Heiko Schulz > (aircraft) and Don Lavelle (airport). We don't have this on Scenemodels. Do we ? At least I can't see any Bucharest models by Don Lavelle there: http://scenemodels.fligh

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the "Screenshot of the week" on the dutchfs home page

2012-02-22 Thread Durk Talsma
On 22 Feb 2012, at 19:15, Gijs de Rooy wrote: > > Gijs' Air Bucharest shot > > All kuddos for that one go to Brett Harrison (livery), Heiko Schulz > (aircraft) and Don Lavelle (airport). > > I was only at the right spot on the right time ;-) But hey, being at the right place at the right tim

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the "Screenshot of the week" on the dutchfs home page

2012-02-22 Thread Curtis Olson
that's photography: being at the right place at the right time and being able to hold the camera steady while you madly flap your wings to keep up with a departing 737. On Feb 22, 2012 12:16 PM, "Gijs de Rooy" wrote: > > Gijs' Air Bucharest shot > > All kuddos for that one go to Brett Harrison (

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the "Screenshot of the week" on the dutchfs home page

2012-02-22 Thread Gijs de Rooy
> Gijs' Air Bucharest shot All kuddos for that one go to Brett Harrison (livery), Heiko Schulz (aircraft) and Don Lavelle (airport). I was only at the right spot on the right time ;-)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the "Screenshot of the week" on the dutchfs home page

2012-02-22 Thread Curtis Olson
Gijs' Air Bucharest shot was the first v2.6 screenshot I collected. It didn't impress me that much at the time, but it has really grown on me over the last few days and it shows up really well as a thumbnail or scaled down version -- not the biggest selling point for a screenshot, but when it come

[Flightgear-devel] FlightGear 2.6.0 is featured in the "Screenshot of the week" on the dutchfs home page

2012-02-22 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi All, Maybe I should have left this to Gijs, because it's his screenshot IIRC, but I couldn't resist: We have an honorable mention on the main page of a mjor Dutch FlightSim site: http://www.dutchfs.com/ Cheers, Durk --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.6.0 for Mac - call for detail bug info & known issues

2012-02-22 Thread HB-GRAL
>> (and I also want someone to give me a Mac that reproduces #7 :-p). >>> It is definitely an OSG/cocoa issue here. Now looking at the first line in main.m of the cocoa example in OSG: "/* OpenSceneGraph example, osgviewerCacoa. " ;-)) Y. --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.6.0 review at golem

2012-02-22 Thread Martin Spott
joac...@gmx.de wrote: > The german IT news site golem.de just published an article about current > Flightgear release: Thanks for mentioning ! It's nice to see that we're finally being heard - for quite a long time "golem.de" behaved as if they were the court reporter for X-Plane. BTW, they're a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.6.0 review at golem

2012-02-22 Thread joacher
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:26:38 -0600 Curtis Olson wrote: > Thank you for helping spread the word about the newest FlightGear > release! Oh, thats a misunderstanding - I am not responsible for this article. I just thought FG community would like to know how the Sim is recognized by media in at lea

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.6.0 review at golem

2012-02-22 Thread Curtis Olson
Thank you for helping spread the word about the newest FlightGear release! On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:23 AM, wrote: > Hi! > > The german IT news site golem.de just published an article about current > Flightgear release: > > > http://www.golem.de/news/flightgear-2-6-0-open-source-flugsimulator-m

[Flightgear-devel] FGFS 2.6.0 review at golem

2012-02-22 Thread joacher
Hi! The german IT news site golem.de just published an article about current Flightgear release: http://www.golem.de/news/flightgear-2-6-0-open-source-flugsimulator-mit-verbesserter-ki-1202-89961.html For people not able to read german: They summarize the changelog and write about the problem

Re: [Flightgear-devel] RE : Did anyone test the 2.6.0 release on Windows 7 64 Bit?

2012-02-22 Thread kreuzritter2000
Am Mittwoch, den 22.02.2012, 08:51 +0100 schrieb Frederic Bouvier: > 1. did these problem occurs in the release candidates or are specific > to the final version ? b89717f9acf01d154c868afadf39b89f Setup FlightGear 2.6.0.exe > 2. We know that you didn't install in "Program Files" but we don't >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery related: groundnetworks and parking

2012-02-22 Thread Martin Spott
Adrian Musceac wrote: > On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 00:57:49 Martin Spott wrote: >> I'll leave it to Durk to commit these files when you consider them >> being ready for use. Anyhow I think we'll need some aid for tracking >> the ground networks, at least in the long run, as there'll be a lot

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2.6.0 for Mac - call for detail bug info & known issues

2012-02-22 Thread Tatsuhiro Nishioka
Hi, So this could be ATI specific problem. I got a report about similar problem with MBP/Radeon X1600 on RC2. I have a dying MBP that has X1600. Unfortumately it has 10.5 so I haven't tried a Cocoa version. I'll Check on this later. Btw, why don't we make a universal binary with i386/Carbon a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug in config file handling

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Gofferje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 22 February 2012 11:26:11 Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Nope - this represents an entire tree and so end up implicitly with ^^ That was the missing puzzle piece :). Tervehdys Suomesta / g

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug in config file handling

2012-02-22 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Am 22.02.2012 10:47, schrieb Stefan Gofferje: > Hm, in my preferences.xml are 2 property rules without any index. Shouldn't > they replace each other then? Nope - this represents an entire tree and so end up implicitly with /sim/systems/property-rule[0]/ /sim/systems/property-rule[1]/ By adding y

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug in config file handling

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Gofferje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wed 22 February 2012 10:27:06 Torsten Dreyer wrote: > Doing so replaces the property-rule defined in the global > preferences.xml at index zero (METAR Interpolation Rule) with the Local > Weather Rule. Hm, in my preferences.xml are 2 property

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SPAM in the MP world

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Gofferje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wed 22 February 2012 09:57:10 Christian Schmitt wrote: > No, I do not agree. But for exactly this purpose we have the "ignore" > checkboxes in the pilot list, which would have solved your problem quite > easily :) No, it wouldn't, unless I see

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug in config file handling

2012-02-22 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Am 21.02.2012 15:32, schrieb Stefan Gofferje: > During my tinkering with Sunrises 1.1, I added the following for the > section: > > > Local Weather Rules > Environment/local-weather-rules.xml > > Doing so replaces the property-rule defined in the global preferences.xml at

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SPAM in the MP world

2012-02-22 Thread Christian Schmitt
Stefan Gofferje wrote: > I think, we should seriously do something about this kind of stuff before > the MP world becomes a popular place for spammers, like e.g. have the MP > servers filter URLs out from the MP chat... > No, I do not agree. But for exactly this purpose we have the "ignore" che

[Flightgear-devel] SPAM in the MP world

2012-02-22 Thread Stefan Gofferje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I was just flying around EFHK without suspecting anything. More or less quickly, some MP user with the CS "dromade" appeared in an ufo, circled around me, asked a few questions like "do you like great airports", then sent an URL from the .br sp

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] TrafficMgr: remove ~5M of unnecessary

2012-02-22 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi, On 21 Feb 2012, at 23:38, Martin Spott wrote: > Chris Forbes wrote: > >> Is it acceptable to send merge requests with a git URL for a server >> elsewhere, or must it be on gitorious? > >> From my perspective it doesn't have to be on Gitorious, as long as you > make it work in a similar man