Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 05:04:06 Martin Spott wrote:
>> It really depends on the particular phrasing in license text.
>> One of the - various - reasons for not providing 'official' FlightGear
>> Scenery with OSM roads is the clause in CC-BY-SA 2.0, which says:
>>
>> "I
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 05:04:06 Martin Spott wrote:
> Scott wrote:
> > But more seriously, I'm no license guru, and you picked one of the main
> > points I'm not clear on, the original CC in this example is
> > "Share-alike" and "Derived works allowed with attribution".
>
> It really depend
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Geymayer
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 10:20 PM
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fgrun and canvas demo
Am 2012-09-05 21:03, schrieb Alan Teeder:
> The current version of FGRun crashes when the C172p canv
> However, in the past couple of weeks ( after a graphics card update for our
> simulator) we started working with FlightGear 2.8.
Thanks a lot for your report! It's really nice and motivating to see
FlightGear being used for serious (research) projects and not just for
fun/gaming. And a full mo
Am 2012-09-05 21:03, schrieb Alan Teeder:
> The current version of FGRun crashes when the C172p canvas demo aircraft
> is selected.
Should be fixed now.
Tom
--
Thomas Geymayer www.tomprogs.at / C-Forum und Tutorial: www.proggen.org
--
..if these scammers feel slandered by that, scammers,
they are entitled to file lawsuits.
..the reason they don't, is they and their lawyers knows
the truth is an allowable and complete defense, and that
judges often award litigation costs to the prevailing
decent truthful people, and to d
On 5 Sep 2012, at 21:13, ThorstenB wrote:
> The XML reader relies on osgDB to resolve paths now. If
> osgDB::findDataFile cannot find the file, it returns "", in which case
> SGModelLib::findDataFile cannot search any additional directories.
> So, maybe osgDB::findDataFile doesn't know about ex
> I'm very suspicious of this - I don't think there's been any post 2.8 commit
> that could change such a core behaviour. (I don't read every single commit in
> detail, but I look at the summaries)
>
> The change is certainly valid, but I'd be much happier knowing why it worked
> before and what br
Hello all,
Since this is my first post here, I'll quickly introduce myself. My name is
Jan Comans and I am currently a PhD student at the Delft University of
Technology with the Control and Simulation (C&S) department. My main focus
is on Human-Machine Interaction. Next to my main research, every
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 15:06 +0100, Alasdair wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 15:47 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Alasdair wrote:
> >
> > > I have narrowed this problem down further.
> > >
> > > Comment out:
> > >
> > >Aircraft/c172p/Systems/instrumentation.xml
> > >
>
Hi,
You can force it by changing the TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES definition
in src/Canvas/ShivaVG/src/CMakeLists.txt to
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(
ShivaVG
${OPENGL_gl_LIBRARY}
${OPENGL_glu_LIBRARY}
m
)
i.e. the line with the "m" on it.
But I am wondering why your libGL does not requ
The current version of FGRun crashes when the C172p canvas demo aircraft is
selected.
Also Fgrun has moved from SVN to Git.
However on the fg forum someone cannot git pull from
git://gitorious.org/fg/fgrun.git. I have found that
https://git.gitorious.org/fg/fgrun.git works fine.
(All this wit
Le 05/09/2012 10:06, Chris Forbes a écrit :
>
> Looks like its not bothering to link against libm (the system math
> library)
>
>
Thank you, but how can I try to force this link?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclus
. If it was up to me, they'd
> be tightly wrapped in wet leather and left in the hot sun as an example to
> others considering similar things.
>
I'd be more than happy to assist you with that.
Syd
--
Live Security Virtua
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Renk Thorsten wrote:
>> We haven't
>> been able to pin them down on a specific technical violation of the gpl,
>> but that doesn't mean they are legitimate, honorable, and ethical.
>
>> They're immoral scammers, plain and simple.
>
> It galls me to speak up for FlightProSim, bu
Thorsten,
I think you are over analyzing these guys and giving them far too much
credit. I think the truth is simpler. They only make sales by misleading
the customer into thinking they are getting something else. They cast a
wide net of shady tactics. So the situation (I believe) is closer to
> We haven't
> been able to pin them down on a specific technical violation of the gpl,
> but that doesn't mean they are legitimate, honorable, and ethical.
> They're immoral scammers, plain and simple.
It galls me to speak up for FlightProSim, but such statements are, as far as I
am concerned,
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 15:47 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Alasdair wrote:
>
> > I have narrowed this problem down further.
> >
> > Comment out:
> >
> >Aircraft/c172p/Systems/instrumentation.xml
> >
> > in c172p-set.xml
> >
> > Similarly
> >
> >
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Martin Spott wrote:
> Renk Thorsten wrote:
>
>> FlightProSim does not defraud its customers as far as I am aware.
>
> According to reports on this very list (hint) and elsewhere they don't
> comply with the money-back guarantee they advertize.
>
Nor do they comply with the GPL
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Alasdair wrote:
> I have narrowed this problem down further.
>
> Comment out:
>
>Aircraft/c172p/Systems/instrumentation.xml
>
> in c172p-set.xml
>
> Similarly
>
>Aircraft/b1900d/Systems/instrumentation.xml
> -->
> in b1900
I have narrowed this problem down further.
Comment out:
Aircraft/c172p/Systems/instrumentation.xml
in c172p-set.xml
Similarly
Aircraft/b1900d/Systems/instrumentation.xml
-->
in b1900d-set.xml
and in the case of the SenecaII
>> FlightProSim does not defraud its customers as far as I am aware.
>
> According to reports on this very list (hint) and elsewhere they don't
> comply with the money-back guarantee they advertize.
Well, since there's always small-print (which I don't know) I would leave that
to the courts to es
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Renk Thorsten wrote:
>
> > FlightProSim does not defraud its customers as far as I am aware.
>
> According to reports on this very list (hint) and elsewhere they don't
> comply with the money-back guarantee they advertize.
I have heard of so
Renk Thorsten wrote:
> FlightProSim does not defraud its customers as far as I am aware.
According to reports on this very list (hint) and elsewhere they don't
comply with the money-back guarantee they advertize.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about wh
>>Hence I would use the same license to keep off scammers.
(...)
> Anything but code should be possible to license similar to GPL, but not
> allowing any commmercial use.
My two cents:
First of all, define your use of 'scammer' here. From Wikipedia, I get "A
confidence trick is also known as a
Scott wrote:
> But more seriously, I'm no license guru, and you picked one of the main
> points I'm not clear on, the original CC in this example is
> "Share-alike" and "Derived works allowed with attribution".
It really depends on the particular phrasing in license text.
One of the - various - r
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:35 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> Scott wrote:
>
> > So my question then is, what path is there to incorporate CC content
> > in scenery that must be GPL???
>
> Under the "this is no legal advice"-clause I'd say it should allow
> derived works to be published under the GPL
Scott wrote:
> So my question then is, what path is there to incorporate CC content
> in scenery that must be GPL???
Under the "this is no legal advice"-clause I'd say it should allow
derived works to be published under the GPL.
BTW, I'm uncertain if we're having the same SRTM-1 in mind. The la
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 12:11 +0200, HB-GRAL wrote:
> Am 05.09.12 11:52, schrieb Scott:
> >
> >While we are on the topic, I'd like to take a different perspective.
> >
> >There are a number of source data files (eg: national SRTM-1 data)
> > that is provided under Creative Commons with licens
Am 05.09.12 11:52, schrieb Scott:
>
>While we are on the topic, I'd like to take a different perspective.
>
>There are a number of source data files (eg: national SRTM-1 data)
> that is provided under Creative Commons with license terms very similar
> as GPL, however it isn't GPL, but it wo
While we are on the topic, I'd like to take a different perspective.
There are a number of source data files (eg: national SRTM-1 data)
that is provided under Creative Commons with license terms very similar
as GPL, however it isn't GPL, but it would appear to have the same aims
as everything
I can confirm that it (--fg-aircraft directories)was broken,and was about to
investigate further when ThorstenB made it work again. Thanks.
I think that the bug appeared very recently, perhaps within the last 2
weeks, but cannot be 100% sure when
Alan
-Original Message-
From: James Tu
On 5 Sep 2012, at 09:06, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On a practical note I'd also point out that some FG development has
> been paid for through the commercial use of FG. In the past I've been
> paid to develop simulations for my local museum of flight, the results
> of which have been fed back int
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Erik Hofman wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 07:50 AM, Michael wrote:
>> No, FlightProSim and whatever they're called.
>>
>> I still think we need another license for sceneries etc. Anything but code
>> should be possible to license similar to GPL, but not allowing any
>> co
Looks like its not bothering to link against libm (the system math library)
On 5/09/2012 7:53 PM, "zezinho" wrote:
> hi, I am trying to package 2.8.0 in my Linux Mageia system, which
> already brings 2.6.0 in rpms.
>
> The 2.8 compilation fails with below error, any hints please? Is it a
> new bu
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 22:14 +0100, Alasdair wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 21:58 +0100, Alasdair wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 22:34 +0200, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If you start FG with --log-level=debug --log-class=view
> > > > > you'll be able to see messages like :
> > > >
On 4 Sep 2012, at 23:09, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
> commit 6745d27691039e2ce477b2e823dbae6c59bc5d00
> Author: ThorstenB
> Date: Tue Sep 4 23:57:25 2012 +0200
>
>#858: Fix loading issue with aircraft models in "--fg-aircraft" directories
>Something after FG 2.8.0 has broken loading
hi, I am trying to package 2.8.0 in my Linux Mageia system, which
already brings 2.6.0 in rpms.
The 2.8 compilation fails with below error, any hints please? Is it a
new build dependency?
[ 4%] Building CXX object src/FDM/YASim/CMakeFiles/yasim.dir/FGFDM.cpp.o
CMakeFiles/ShivaVG.dir/shContext.
38 matches
Mail list logo
