Op 12-3-2012 15:26, Martin Spott schreef:
> That's an interesting case and we probably had a similar one recently
> in Germany. Did they try to sue anyone who *published* these
> photographs (on their private Picasa/Flickr/Panoramio or other albums)
> or just those who *sold* photographs ? Cheer
Op 12-3-2012 14:33, Martin Spott schreef:
> Robin van Steenbergen wrote:
>
>> In case of a building or airport modeled off a map, how is the original
>> map-maker going to recognize that the runway (12000ft long) was actually
>> derived from *his* map?
> I'd
There is a big difference between republishing a printed work and using
it for a derivative, such as deducting measurements from a (paper) map
to make a computer model of the streets or buildings which are also
represented on the map.
First off, in the case of a direct republish, the map's publ
I am not sure whether the content *generated* by a GPL-licensed
program (such as FlightGear generating screenshots) would have to be
licensed under the GPL as well.
To be honest, I doubt it, because a lot of GPL-licensed tools are used
to generate copyrighted content, even including Hollywood
Op 7-11-2010 21:14, Durk Talsma schreef
> - Gijs and Jorg trying to outperform each other in terms of their helicopter
> flying skills (trying to land it on a chimney, once they found the helipad to
> easy).
Were the choppers loaded with presents and were they wearing red robes
and a funny hat
I need a carpool from Eindhoven (or somewhere halfway, like Utrecht)
because train and bus schedules to Lelystad are somewhat impractical.
The bus to the airport has an hourly or 2-hourly service IIRC, and
taking the train and bus takes me over 3 hours to get there (where it
would only take me 1
I need a carpool from Eindhoven (or somewhere halfway, like Utrecht)
because train and bus schedules to Lelystad are somewhat impractical.
The bus to the airport has an hourly or 2-hourly service IIRC, and
taking the train and bus takes me over 3 hours to get there (where it
would only take m
I need a carpool from Eindhoven (or somewhere halfway, like Utrecht)
because train and bus schedules to Lelystad are somewhat impractical.
The bus to the airport has an hourly or 2-hourly service IIRC, and
taking the train and bus takes me over 3 hours to get there (where it
would only take me 1
If there is still any need, I'd be happy to help out the FlightGear
booth for half a day or one day at the FSWeekend.
I will only need a carpool either from Eindhoven on Saturday, or back to
Eindhoven on Sunday. The former is preferred, and I won't need a booth
holders ticket per se.
Op 28-1
On 3/18/2010 9:55 AM, James Turner wrote:
> Replying to some specifics, I'll let Syd comment in general since he's the
> Primus author, and has seem more documentation than me by far.
>
>
I've done some work on developing a Primus simulation package, albeit a
standalone one for use with FS200
And don't forget T-DOSE in Eindhoven, October 3-4th!
http://www.t-dose.org
I'll be at the FSW like pretty much every year. Still have to figure out
which stand I'll participate with.
Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Hi Durk,
>
> > First, and foremost, however, I would like to sent of a call for
> > part
On samedi 01 août 2009, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> Today I got sad news: Georg Vollnhals, also known as Heliflyer, passed away
> last month. Heliflyer was very involved with the Project FlightGear. He was
> very keen on making sceneries; he also programmed one of the first tools
> f
On samedi 01 août 2009, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> Today I got sad news: Georg Vollnhals, also known as Heliflyer, passed away
> last month. Heliflyer was very involved with the Project FlightGear. He was
> very keen on making sceneries; he also programmed one of the first tools
> f
On dimanche 05 juillet 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Quijano wrote:
> > The specific "culprits" today are Syd Adams (dhc2, for sure and dhc6
> > also, I think) and Gerard Robin (PBY-Catalina). There might have been
> > more cases today,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> I'm (still) against binary runtime modules for FlightGear.
>
I'm more curious as to whether we need them.
The entire guts of FlightGear are available to almost anyone via
external communications (e.g. sockets) and Nasal. Why not write a
communications script or Nasal s
On mardi 05 mai 2009, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
> Hi Torsten and others,
>
> > > I assumed that the function should also be accessible via other
> > > means than just the dialog (e.g. keyboard bindings). If not,
> > > then I absolutely agree with your change. That's the cleanest way.
> >
> > I'll leave t
On mardi 05 mai 2009, Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
> Alexis Bory wrote:
> > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Nasal In directory
> > baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9196
> >
> > Modified Files: pushback.nas Log Message: - Now the pushback "door"
> > will be created only if /sim/model/pushba
Ouups , forget the funny previous mail
On vendredi 24 avril 2009, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Mathias wrote
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 02:34:06 gerard robin wrote:
> > > On mardi 21 avril 2009, syd adams wrote:
> > > > Im getting the sam
On vendredi 24 avril 2009, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Mathias wrote
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday 21 April 2009 02:34:06 gerard robin wrote:
> > > On mardi 21 avril 2009, syd adams wrote:
> > > > Im getting the same messages at startup , at any airport I
On jeudi 23 avril 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> > I've been seeing this every time I load on Ubuntu Hardy. I'm 90% sure
> > that the ridge-lift enhancement is the root cause - it's the only
> > source change that went in when I rebuilt last.
>
> We've occasionally seen lots o
On mardi 21 avril 2009, syd adams wrote:
> Im getting the same messages at startup , at any airport I try ,
> but usually it stops after an exit and restart.
> I thought it was something local since no one on IRC had the same problem.
The same error not only with Vinson
I am mainly flying with
Hello,
Only a question , to avoid , to die idiot.
When i am flying with MP with any Aircraft but a f-14 and when a f-14 is
flown by an other pilot , i get within the internal property a
folder /f-14/ with several item which seem unuseful (since empty).
/f-14/burner
/f-14/wing-bend
Hello,
Only a question , to avoid , to die idiot.
When i am flying with MP with any Aircraft but a f-14 and when a f-14 is
flown by an other pilot , i get within the internal property a
folder /f-14/ with several item which seem unuseful (since empty).
/f-14/burner
/f-14/wing-bend
Hello,
If you love the Corsair , here the opportunity to get one.
http://www.provenancefightersales.com/vought_f4u5nl.htm
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé.
Voltaire
---
On lundi 13 avril 2009, jean pellotier wrote:
> Mathias Fröhlich a écrit :
> >> I tested this few more times, in a place with severals carriers
> >> (eisenhower, foch, clemenceau...) and if i start FG far from this place,
> >> then move with the location menu to the closest airport, carriers are
>
On vendredi 10 avril 2009, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alexis Bory has added some wonderful detail to our model of the Nimitz
> class. I think he's mad :-) but see for yourself:
>
> ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/Nimitz/Vinson-1.jpg
> ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/Nimitz/Vinson-2.jpg
Have you tried inverting the Y-axis? ;-)
(Sorry, in the light of the recent prank pulled by YouTube, I couldn't
resist.)
Jason Cox wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am having a problem generating scenery with srtm2 data for Australia
> the problem is that I can hgtchop the files up ok, but when generating
>
On mercredi 01 avril 2009, jean pellotier wrote:
> Jon S. Berndt a écrit :
> > Yes, the difference stems from the need to know what the wind is
> > bringing, and the vectorial definition of where it's going. The problem
> > was that sometimes we just had a vector where we expected to see North,
> >
On jeudi 02 avril 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On mercredi 01 avril 2009, jean pellotier wrote:
> > Jon S. Berndt a écrit :
> > > Yes, the difference stems from the need to know what the wind is
> > > bringing, and the vectorial definition of where it's going. The
On mercredi 01 avril 2009, jean pellotier wrote:
> Jon S. Berndt a écrit :
> > Yes, the difference stems from the need to know what the wind is
> > bringing, and the vectorial definition of where it's going. The problem
> > was that sometimes we just had a vector where we expected to see North,
> >
On mardi 31 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
SNIP
>
> m.
>
No comments.
Sure i am wrong everywhere :) :) :) big, very , very big
laughing...
I do accept to be the bad boy of the story , i don't mind about it, since that
story has not any consequence , on the life of the world ( t
On lundi 30 mars 2009, George Patterson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:34 AM, LeeE wrote:
> > If the aircraft is going to be maintained ex-cvs but not maintained
> > within cvs, then retaining it within cvs just adds another
> > unmaintained aircraft to the list.
> >
> > While someone, at som
Hello,
I take acknowledge of the Curt mail about my whitdraw from the CVS, and of the
different answers to his question.
When i sent the mal to Curt , which inform him that i will not longer
maintain the CVS models ( from me) , my target was ONLY to ask him to delete
my right access , in order
On mercredi 25 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 23:42:18 jean pellotier wrote:
> > I use a scenario that make it solid, and the wire usable, and now after
> > the ground cache change i removed all part and it's still solid
> > , and more dangerous because the i
On mercredi 25 mars 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > On mardi 24 mars 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> >> gerard robin wrote:
> >>
> >> As Mathias probably does better with the F-18 than any other member of
> >> this crowd, I think he
On mardi 24 mars 2009, jean pellotier wrote:
> gerard robin a écrit :
> > foch/clemenceau (the same carrier, old version from cvs ) was built for
> > JSBsim aircrafts ( the Crusader and others from my hangar) , it was (is)
> > probably not YASim compatible ( not consisten
On mardi 24 mars 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
> > Mathias sorry for the Noise , you won't have to learn to fly the F8 .
>
> As Mathias probably does better with the F-18 than any other member of
> this crowd, I think he would not face too severe diffi
On mardi 24 mars 2009, jean pellotier wrote:
> jean pellotier a écrit :
> > Vivian Meazza a écrit :
> >> I've been testing the carrier stuff with YASim. It usually works, but a
> >> occasionally the deck isn't solid, and the ac falls right through on
> >> landing. This bug is intermittent: I have b
On mardi 24 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On mardi 24 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 23 March 2009 13:14:49 gerard robin wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > Hmm, I have now tried with the default cessna.
> > Due to the low approach
On mardi 24 mars 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Specter wrote:
> > I write patch for changes of JSB turbine starter spin time.
>
> Dave just recently committed this patch to JSBSim and I am preparing a
> new sync between them soon so it'll end op in FlightGear that way.
>
> Erik
>
Does that will modi
On mardi 24 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 23 March 2009 13:14:49 gerard robin wrote:
SNIP
>
> Hmm, I have now tried with the default cessna.
> Due to the low approach speed this works well.
> Starting at the Nimitz and landing there. Applying brakes b
On lundi 23 mars 2009, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ..sorry guys, I hit the wrong button:
> ..on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:54:02 +0100, Gerard wrote in message
>
> <200903231554.03018.ghma...@gmail.com>:
> > On lundi 23 mars 2009, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
SNIP
>
> ..I am (quite possibly cluelessly) suggestin
On lundi 23 mars 2009, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:14:49 +0100, Gerard wrote in message
>
> <200903231314.49784.ghma...@gmail.com>:
> > My purpose was to point that error:
> >
> > When we start FG with a JSBSim aircraft on a moving carrier the
> > groundcache is right, the Aircra
On lundi 23 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 22 March 2009 02:39:29 gerard robin wrote:
> > With JSBsim aircraft i get now some strange behaviour regarding the
> > groundcache on a moving Carrier.
> >
> > We can start from catapult on car
Hello, Mathias
With JSBsim aircraft i get now some strange behaviour regarding the
groundcache on a moving Carrier.
We can start from catapult on carrier, and the Aircraft is sitting correctly
in place on the Ship , it follows correctly the speed of the carrier. => No
problem :)
After bein
Hello, Mathias
With JSBsim aircraft i get now some strange behaviour regarding the
groundcache on a moving Carrier.
We can start from catapult on carrier, and the Aircraft is sitting correctly
in place on the Ship , it follows correctly the speed of the carrier. => No
problem :)
After bein
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> > Then, do you mean that the old "Radar Fashion" will be removed,
> > what a pity.
>
> I haven't planned that (yet). But in the long run it should get
> removed. This
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Thursday 19 March 2009:
> > With the usual AI tankers we have a lot of data regarding the Radar
> > x-shift y-shift in-range , rotation, v-offset, .. and so on
> >
> > That tanker feature don
On lundi 16 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> While we are at it, here some comments on tanker.nas:
>
> There's a menu entry AI/MP->Tanker, which opens a small dialog where
> you can request a tanker. It'll contact you and tell you something
> like this:
>
> "MOBIL3 at 15000, heading 130 with 25
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> > On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Given this thread.
> > > I have checked in the change to simgear.
> > > I ha
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given this thread.
> > I have checked in the change to simgear.
> > I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that
> > I t
On jeudi 19 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given this thread.
> I have checked in the change to simgear.
> I have also updated the default c172 and selectively those submodels that I
> thought need some update.
> And I have updated all the ac models in the AI and the Models subdirecto
On lundi 16 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 12 March 2009 22:43:15 jean pellotier wrote:
> > I've got a problem with the elevators on nimitz, since some days, when
> > called up, it looks ok, but elevator 3d model isn't solid, the part
> > solid is where is the elevator dow
On lundi 16 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On lundi 16 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For ac models, we have currently a step in the scenery loading process
> > that modifies the material settings to match the material settings of the
> >
On lundi 16 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For ac models, we have currently a step in the scenery loading process that
> modifies the material settings to match the material settings of the old
> plib loader.
> In fact this just overwrites the material settings and throws away use
On dimanche 15 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Sunday 15 March 2009:
> > => make sure /systems/refuel/ exists <=
> >
> > Since a specific AAR could use any other specific property
>
> This should have been "systems/refuel", wit
On dimanche 15 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Sunday 15 March 2009:
> > You should know that aircrafts which have some specific AAR won't
> > be able to use it.
>
> All that work(ed) with the tanker scenarios should also work with
> this. It do
If that is . right
=> allow aar-equipped aircraft to request a tanker everywhere without
scenario <==
You should know that aircrafts which have some specific AAR won't be able to
use it.
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la
On dimanche 15 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Sunday 15 March 2009:
> > I am getting an horizontal line on screen , that is not new,
>
> Yes, that's where near-camera and far-camera meet (well, or *should*
> meet :-). It's a known problem,
Hello,
I am getting an horizontal line on screen , that is not new, i had it
before, (at least two months ago) .
The position of the line is dependent of the view angle, bottom when looking
to down, top when looking to up.
It is not graphic card dependent , since i get it on several GPU (
On jeudi 12 mars 2009, jean pellotier wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've got a problem with the elevators on nimitz, since some days, when
> called up, it looks ok, but elevator 3d model isn't solid, the part
> solid is where is the elevator down.
> each try i finish on the low position (in best case) under the
On mercredi 11 mars 2009, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Having noticed that the Vulcan still refers to starting the engines using
> the space bar (whoops!), I did a quick grep of the .xml files in Aircraft,
> and found reference to "space" in the aircraft indicated below.
>
> If any aircraf
On mercredi 11 mars 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> > With JSBSim aircrafts i get exactly the same problem/errors , it
> > happens
> > mainly when i do an airborn for long trip ( more than 1 hour) with
> > autopilot.
> > I got that errors with several models not only a specific one.
> >
> > To me, tha
On mercredi 11 mars 2009, syd adams wrote:
> Thanks , I was trying to figure out how to use gdb too :). I had a few
> errors here , maybe related .
> While testing the P47 , I took off from KSFO and headed towards the
> Nimitz.At about the coastline , altitude about 2000 ft every thing
> paused...
On mardi 10 mars 2009, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009 14:16:23 Matthew Barousse wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > I'm currently attempting to modify flight gear, so that I may save and
> > re-play flights, exactly like the instant replay feature, but with a save
> > file.
> >
> > My next ta
On lundi 09 mars 2009, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi Gerard,
>
> On Monday 09 March 2009 12:06:58 gerard robin wrote:
> > Yes with JSBSim there is the same "NAN" error , more or les randomly.
> > Difficult to catch a specific cause.
>
> Do you mean that you can repl
On lundi 09 mars 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On dimanche 08 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Nicolas Quijano -- Sunday 08 March 2009:
> > > As for "secret sources", they'll name themselves if they feel
> > > like it,
> >
> > That would b
On dimanche 08 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Nicolas Quijano -- Sunday 08 March 2009:
> > As for "secret sources", they'll name themselves if they feel
> > like it,
>
> That would be fun! But I won't hold my breath.
>
I don't know if i am part of that "secret sources", anyhow , in my case,
On lundi 09 mars 2009, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi Geoff,
>
> On Sunday 08 March 2009 20:56:52 Geoff McLane wrote:
> > Yep!
> >
> > Tried ...
> > --aircraft=CitationX --airport=CYOW --runway=25 --fg-scenery=
> > $HOME/Scenery-1.0.1
>
> Thanks for you report. Good to know, I'm not the only one, at that
On jeudi 05 mars 2009, Detlef Faber wrote:
> Ncolas,
>
> I didn't want to comment on your first post, everyone has a bad day
> sometimes, but here I like to add my 2 ct anyway.
>
> I'm a simple content contributor with very little background in
> programming. When I made my first Aircraft (the bf1
On dimanche 01 mars 2009, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Fred,
>
> On Sunday 01 March 2009 18:40:20 Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> > I see a huge memory consumption when trying to start from EGLL ( or
> > EDDF, or EHAM, or LFPO ) with the scenery available via TerraSync/SVN.
> > The process memory climbs to
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Nicolas Quijano wrote:
> Gerard, you're not getting it : if I want wildfire to spread when I crash a
> Crusader, you shouldn't have a say in it, period.
> Let me try to explain it from the user's perspective : a user of both the
> dev's creation, the simulation, and in
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:36:30 + (GMT), Stuart wrote in message
>
>
> ..then you have exotic compromises like crashing on ice, dead stick
> landings in methane clouds downwind of broken pipelines, ripe full
> hydrazine tanks as you ditch in free
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Detlef Faber wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 15.02.2009, 09:45 +0100 schrieb Detlef Faber:
> > Am Samstag, den 14.02.2009, 23:15 +0100 schrieb gerard robin:
> > > On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > > * Gerard Robi
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Laurent wrote:
> IMHO, in that case this is a bug about when wildfire should be
> started. If the plane is actually missing a landing on water, it
> should be detected by the main program as it, not as a land crash. A
> catalina crashing on land should create fire. Deac
On dimanche 15 février 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On dimanche 15 février 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:56 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
> > > On samedi 14 février 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> > > > On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ w
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:56 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
> > On samedi 14 février 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> > > On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > > * Gerard Robin -- Saturday 14 Februa
On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Gerard Robin -- Saturday 14 February 2009:
> > Log Message:
> > withdraw the "game coat"
> >
> > +
> > +
> > + false
> > +
> > +
On samedi 14 février 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > * Gerard Robin -- Saturday 14 February 2009:
> > > Log Message:
> > > withdraw the "game coat"
> > >
> > > +
On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Gerard Robin -- Saturday 14 February 2009:
> > Log Message:
> > withdraw the "game coat"
> >
> > +
> > +
> > + false
> > +
> > +
On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Saturday 14 February 2009:
> > Won't it be better to have it default "false" ?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I did not find any box within menu to modify it like we have
> > with cloud , light .
Hello ,
I noticed about wildfire
the default within the preference file is
true
true
Won't it be better to have it default "false" ?
I did not find any box within menu to modify it like we have with cloud ,
light and so on.
For some reason, if we don't want it ( look like a game :(
On jeudi 12 février 2009, syd adams wrote:
> No problem, :)
>
> In anycase when one don't know an aircraft it is ever difficult for him to
> update the model.
>
> I guess that it is better to ask to the original author to do the update,
> when necessary.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> --
> Gérard
> http://p
On jeudi 12 février 2009, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> > AFAICS Stuart did his best to track down and update all uses of level-lb
> > in CVS.
>
> Oups, it was Syd who did this work. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Anders
No problem, :)
In any
On jeudi 12 février 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On jeudi 12 février 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 19:05 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
> > > Wy i do have that stupid message ?
> > >
> > >
> > > ***
> > > ***
> > > *
On jeudi 12 février 2009, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> > I don't understand this :
> > /tank[0]/level-lb seems to be replaced by /tank[0]/level-lbs
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, since we use -lbs everywhere else (in JSBSim too) and this
I don't understand this :
/tank[0]/level-lb seems to be replaced by /tank[0]/level-lbs
What is the matter ?
Since the properties which are declared within the FDM ( JSBSim) become
wrong.
thanks
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon
On jeudi 12 février 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 19:05 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
> > Wy i do have that stupid message ?
> >
> >
> > ***
> > ***
> > *** Warning: changing bad FG_ROOT/--fg-root
> > to '/usr/local/share/FlightGe
Wy i do have that stupid message ?
***
***
*** Warning: changing bad FG_ROOT/--fg-root
to '/usr/local/share/FlightGear/data'
***
***
I never had it before ( from the prehistoric FG ages)
Last fgfs cvs last stable osg (2.8) and plib svn
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
J'ai déc
On mercredi 11 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Wednesday 11 February 2009:
> > I disagree, since there is a mixing of supposed to be developer
> > 'developing' and user 'using'.
>
> Sure, every developer is also a user. You are certa
On mercredi 11 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * gerard robin -- Wednesday 11 February 2009:
> > Then my question which folder must used ? branches ? tags ? trunk ?
>
> $ svn co https://plib.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/plib/trunk plib
>
> tags and branches in svn a
On mercredi 11 février 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 02:47 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
> > How do we get the plib/svn which is the link, ?
> > Within Plib official page
> > http://plib.sourceforge.net/download.html
> > there is nothing about
On jeudi 29 janvier 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> In the last time I've submitted several fixes to plib, all of
> which are now committed. It is now recommended to use plib/svn
> (HEAD). Here's a list of the most important changes:
>
> - fix calculation of the slider handle size in
> widgets (as
On mardi 10 février 2009, gerard robin wrote:
> On mardi 10 février 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> > alex wrote:
> > > Does OpenAL support any other sound file configuration other than .wav?
> > > I have problems with OpenAL unable to buffer some ..wav files but runs
>
On mardi 10 février 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> alex wrote:
> > Does OpenAL support any other sound file configuration other than .wav?
> > I have problems with OpenAL unable to buffer some ..wav files but runs
> > fine with other .wav files. Does anyone know of a particular reason for
> > this.
> >
On mardi 10 février 2009, Harry Campigli wrote:
> I have used SUSE for years, currently using 10.3. but feel it has "gone
> off" since version 9. However I have always managed to build FG from source
> on it with a bit off mucking around but never Terragear.
>
> For along time I have wondered about
On lundi 09 février 2009, alex wrote:
> Does OpenAL support any other sound file configuration other than .wav?
> I have problems with OpenAL unable to buffer some .wav files but runs fine
> with other .wav files. Does anyone know of a particular reason for this.
> Your thoughts would be appreciate
On vendredi 06 février 2009, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> > Where is the "proper" gear model patch, Martin? mail.flightgear.org
> > is down so the archives prior to 2005 are unreachable. I'm interested
> > in taking a look.
> >
> > I'm also wondering what is stopping you from grabbing a copy of
> > JS
On samedi 07 février 2009, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:50:57 FGD ML wrote:
> > 2009/2/7 Roy Vegard Ovesen
> >
> > > On Saturday 07 February 2009 10:22:09 Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
> > > > As I said the .lwo file that Blender generated did _not_ contain any
> > > > ref
On samedi 07 février 2009, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:39:13 FGD ML wrote:
> > 2009/2/7 Arnt Karlsen
> >
> > > ..ah, that's where I try to help out. ;o)
> >
> > I'm sorry , I have a policy of not accepting cold callers.
>
> I hope you find comfort in the fact t
1 - 100 of 687 matches
Mail list logo
