Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-02-09 Thread syd adams
Maybe Ive been fighting with this laptop harddrive too long , but I have no idea what you just said here ... :) On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Pete Morgan wrote: > The 777 is totally in dev.. and making all sorts of capers.. > > I guess we have to sit back and wait for Syd to decide the "aircr

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-02-09 Thread Pete Morgan
The 777 is totally in dev.. and making all sorts of capers.. I guess we have to sit back and wait for Syd to decide the "aircraft" and its systems is worthy of "testing". In the meantime its a pointless task as the path is not identified, or indeed the "path" mapped. So come back later (BTW the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-02-09 Thread syd adams
Yeah it needs more work still , Heiko also reported some problems with it , but Ive been fighting with the daughter's laptop the last few days ... I'll do more checking once i get that running. (She NEEDS her facebook !) ... Cheers On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:29 PM, bitwPolly wrote: > > As far as

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-02-09 Thread bitwPolly
As far as I can tell, the autopilot's roll stability has recently degraded. With a cvs build Feb 8th, with A/P engaged, the 77-200 rolls plus / minus about twenty degrees all altitudes, throttle settings: A/P heading mode. I'm pretty sure the 777 was roll stable two weeks ago, mp players re

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-02-09 Thread bitwPolly
As far as I can tell, the autopilot's roll stability has recently degraded. With a cvs build Feb 8th, with A/P engaged, the 77-200 rolls plus / minus about twenty degrees all altitudes, throttle settings: A/P heading mode. I'm pretty sure the 777 was roll stable two weeks ago, mp players rep

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-01-28 Thread syd adams
already fixed and commited .Needed to clamp minimum airspeed above 0. On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Patrice Poly wrote: > mm, nevermind, I still have the mistake, even without pushback. > > > -- > The Planet: dedicat

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-01-28 Thread Patrice Poly
mm, nevermind, I still have the mistake, even without pushback. -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose f

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-01-28 Thread Patrice Poly
This seems to work for me : var FPangle = math.asin( VS/math.abs(TAS) ) * 90; On 28/01/2010 04:28, syd adams wrote: > Good point , I'll try the abs . That formula continuously calculates the > flight path angle from vertical and forward speed fpm ... I saw the error > but hadnt figured it out y

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-01-27 Thread Victhor Foster
The 777-200ER had a working FPA vertical mode? I thought it was just pitch hold :p That's nice. > Good point , I'll try the abs . That formula continuously calculates the > flight path angle from vertical and forward speed fpm ... I saw the error > but hadnt figured it out yet didnt even

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-01-27 Thread syd adams
Good point , I'll try the abs . That formula continuously calculates the flight path angle from vertical and forward speed fpm ... I saw the error but hadnt figured it out yet didnt even think about a negative velocity ... Thanks for that tip :) I experience a nasal error when using the pus

[Flightgear-devel] 777-200ER another little bug

2010-01-27 Thread Patrice Poly
Hello Syd, thank you for your answers ! I found the ADF, I was searching for it in the VOR screen, like you said its on the map. I found the radio, too, digging between seats :) I experience a nasal error when using the pushback or thrust reverse to get off the dock : Nasal runtime error: floatin