Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Curtis Olson wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 9:33 AM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote: >> And it keeps two instances of every single file. That makes >> 2 GB for all aircraft, rather than CVS' 1 GB. It's easy to >> be quicker at updating, with this "little" help. A

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 29 November 2007: >> I wonder if it would be worth moving all the aircraft to a >> separate repository. > > That would mean to download 1 GB of *unchanged* aircraft data just > for the reorgani

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Melchior wrote: > * Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 29 November 2007: > > I wonder if it would be worth moving all the aircraft to a > > separate repository. > > That would mean to download 1 GB of *unchanged* aircraft data just > for the reorganization. I'm not thrilled. (Unless someone offers > a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread Curtis Olson
On Nov 29, 2007 9:33 AM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote: > * AnMaster -- Thursday 29 November 2007: > > Why is the cvs up so slow, even when there are no changes? > > I don't know about CVS but I think svn at least just send the > > difference between the old and new revision. > > So does CVS. > > > > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* AnMaster -- Thursday 29 November 2007: > Why is the cvs up so slow, even when there are no changes? > I don't know about CVS but I think svn at least just send the > difference between the old and new revision. So does CVS. > And svn tend to be faster at updating... And it keeps two instanc

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Stuart Buchanan -- Thursday 29 November 2007: > I wonder if it would be worth moving all the aircraft to a > separate repository. That would mean to download 1 GB of *unchanged* aircraft data just for the reorganization. I'm not thrilled. (Unless someone offers a CVS "skeleton". And a script w

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread AnMaster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Why is the cvs up so slow, even when there are no changes? I don't know about CVS but I think svn at least just send the difference between the old and new revision. And svn tend to be faster at updating... /AnMaster Stuart Buchanan wrote: > Hi All

[Flightgear-devel] Aircraft repository

2007-11-29 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, The number of aircraft in CVS continue to grow at a quite incredible rate. We now have over 170, and there aren't enough hours in the day to fly all of them the amount of time that they really deserve. I haven't graphed the number of new aircraft per month, but it certainly feels that n