Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Hi Olaf, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > > OSG requires LPEG, GIF, TIFF and PNG support. Typically these are being > > IMHO OSG requires png and rgb plugin support. Or did I miss something > where GIF or TIFF is needed? Well, at least when you build the 'standard' set of OSG plugins (on Unix), then suppo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Hi, > OSG requires LPEG, GIF, TIFF and PNG support. Typically these are being IMHO OSG requires png and rgb plugin support. Or did I miss something where GIF or TIFF is needed? Thumbnails are in jpeg format, just to make sure I included the jpeg osg plugin. Olaf --

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

> > I think you will need at least libjpeg-devel and > giflib-devel. giflib-devel is the one I hit which wasn't > installed by default on fedora. Or just look in OpenSceneGraph/make/makedirdefs And change these accordingly ifeq ($(LIBJPEG_INSTALLED),yes) PLUGIN_DIRS += jpeg endif ife

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Curtis Olson wrote: > I think you will need at least libjpeg-devel and giflib-devel. > giflib-devel is the one I hit which wasn't installed by default on fedora. > > Curt. Right, I knew that ;-), Should have had my morning coffee first, before trying something more complicated than walking.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

John Wojnaroski wrote: > `/usr/local/src/OSG_OP_OT-1.2-Flightgear/OpenSceneGraph/src/osgPlugins/jpeg/Linux32.Opt' > g++ -M -I../../../../include ../ReaderWriterJPEG.cpp pipeto > .depend/ReaderWriterJPEG.cpp > ../ReaderWriterJPEG.cpp:50:25: jpeglib.h: No such file or directory > ../ReaderWriterJ

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

I think you will need at least libjpeg-devel and giflib-devel.  giflib-devel is the one I hit which wasn't installed by default on fedora. Curt. On 11/12/06, John Wojnaroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mathias Fröhlich wrote:>On Friday 10 November 2006 19:28, John Wojnaroski wrote:Frederic Bouv

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Mathias Fröhlich wrote: >On Friday 10 November 2006 19:28, John Wojnaroski wrote: > > >>Frederic Bouvier wrote: >> >> >>>Quoting John Wojnaroski : >>> >>> Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

On Friday 10 November 2006 19:28, John Wojnaroski wrote: > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > >Quoting John Wojnaroski : > >>Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? > >>will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest > >>cvs version? > > > >This is mandator

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Georg Vollnhals wrote: >John Wojnaroski schrieb: > > >>Frederic Bouvier wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>Quoting John Wojnaroski : >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? will the latest released version work or is it best to get the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Georg Vollnhals schrieb: > John Wojnaroski schrieb: > >> > Let Mathias explain it (= one of his older replies from this list!): > > .. > You did use the patched osg version from > > ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Misc_maf/OpenSceneGraph-20061029/ > > ?? > > I believe to remember that su

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

John Wojnaroski schrieb: > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > > >> Quoting John Wojnaroski : >> >> >> >>> Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? >>> will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest >>> cvs version? >>> >>> >>> >> This i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Frederic Bouvier wrote: >Quoting John Wojnaroski : > > >>Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? >>will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest >>cvs version? >> >> > >This is mandatory in any case. FlightGear and SimGear should match. >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Quoting John Wojnaroski : > Understand we still need plib, the openal stuff; what about Simgear? > will the latest released version work or is it best to get the latest > cvs version? This is mandatory in any case. FlightGear and SimGear should match. -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier http://frfoto.free

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

John Wojnaroski wrote: >Curtis Olson wrote: > > > >>On 11/10/06, John Wojnaroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> wrote: >> >>Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG >>port. An >>earlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the >>

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Hi Jack,Try this link, I'll update the link on the web site.http://cvs.flightgear.org/cgi-bin/viewvc/viewvc.cgi/source.tar.gz?view=tar Issue is that the old viewcvs.cgi is broke, now using viewvc.cgi, but for some reason never uninnstalled viewcvs.cgi, probably should do that someday.Curt.ps. sorry

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Curtis Olson wrote: > On 11/10/06, John Wojnaroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG > port. An > earlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the > c172. After > getting the f

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Martin Spott wrote: >John Wojnaroski wrote: > > >>Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. >> >> >[...] > > >>About the only strange, quirky thing is that when untarring the file, >>getting a warning msg regards time stamp set to the epoch on some of the >>file

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

On 11/10/06, John Wojnaroski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port.  Anearlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the c172.  Aftergetting the fresh tar file I casually blew away the earlier version and untarred the fresh one.  Now

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Build problem

John Wojnaroski wrote: > Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. [...] > About the only strange, quirky thing is that when untarring the file, > getting a warning msg regards time stamp set to the epoch on some of the > files. Am I grabbing a wrong copy? Using the "de

[Flightgear-devel] Build problem

Downloaded a fresh CVS copy to try out the updates to the OSG port. An earlier first attempt built and segfaulted when loading the c172. After getting the fresh tar file I casually blew away the earlier version and untarred the fresh one. Now when starting the build sequence with autogen.sh