Maxime Guillaud wrote:
> ok. Meanwhile, my understanding is that I can distribute my OSM-based
> scenery under the Attribution-Share Alike Creative Commons license
> without problems. Correct ?
If it's data you submitted to OSM yourself then you can use any license
you like, since you still re
> I'm pretty much convinced that your goal and ours are not that far
> apart from each other. In other words: "pushing things to a new level"
> doesn't make your project a unique one.
Indeed, I think everyone working on scenery shares some common goals.
There is currently nothing unique about my w
Martin Spott wrote:
> I'm well familiar with reading French - thanks for the pointer !
> Apparently these use terms are quite different from those on the EEA
> site. This really looks like we should incorporate French CORINE data
> into our collection of land cover data for the World Scenery. I'll
Martin Spott wrote:
> BUT we're taking different routes to get there - obviously. "We",
> sometimes also known as The Custom Scenery Project, are researching how
> to automate as many of the involved refinement steps as possible while
> still allowing for manual editing, in order to let the entire
Jacob Burbach wrote:
>> Next time you do that you'd probably consider acknowledging the
>> respective attributes in the OSM data: They're explicitly marking these
>> sections of the railroad as running through a tunnel ;-)
>
> Interesting, seems I may have totally overlooked that one, I'll look
>
> Next time you do that you'd probably consider acknowledging the
> respective attributes in the OSM data: They're explicitly marking these
> sections of the railroad as running through a tunnel ;-)
Interesting, seems I may have totally overlooked that one, I'll look
into it. I can prob have thos
Hi Jacob,
Jacob Burbach wrote:
> [...] The other thing I'm spending a fair amount of time on is
> the identifying tunnels for roads and rails, so they do not cut
> through mountains and such. A fair number of people have commented on
> my scenery about "that strange peak near LOWI" being fixed. T
Salut Maxime,
Maxime Guillaud wrote:
> Thanks for those explanations, Martin. However, let me point out that
> the license for the CORINE data for France seems pretty flexible to me.
> (Note that this is true for France only, and that each country
> distributes their data with their own licens
While it would be neat if flightgear could generate the default
scenery off of high quality data, there is still a fair bit of manual
work involved to get good results. OSM and Corine, while both very
accurate, don't necessarily agree with one another. I've spent a
considerable amount of time tweak
Martin Spott wrote:
> People have probably started wondering why those who claim to be busy
> building and distributing World Scenery for FlightGear didn't jump on
> the same track, using CORINE and OSM data as input for the World
> Scenery, like Jake did with 'his' Innsbruck Scenery (as well as a
Erik Hofman wrote:
> Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/FlightGear_Newsletter_August_2009
>
> Looking at the custom made scenery screenshots I must say that hand
> altered scenery might look close to, if not as good as, photo realistic
> scenery.
People have probabl
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have the pleasure to announce that the latest edition of the FlightGear
> Newsletter is now available:
>
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/FlightGear_Newsletter_August_2009
Looking at the custom made scenery screenshots I must say that hand
altered
Hi All,
I have the pleasure to announce that the latest edition of the FlightGear
Newsletter is now available:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/FlightGear_Newsletter_August_2009
As always, new submissions are welcome, and can be added to the next edition.
-Stuart
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
